Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 585 Cal
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2021
Ct.
No. 27.01 W.P.A. 1887 of 2021
26 2021 Dhanapati Biswas
Vs.
241 The State of West Bengal & Ors.
akb
Ms. Sabita Khutia (Bhunya) ...For the Petitioner
Ms. Neelam Singh ...For the State
1. Affidavit of service filed in court today is kept
with the record.
2. The husband of the petitioner was an Assistant
Teacher of a High School who retired from service on
30.11.2009. The petitioner had completed all his pension
related formalities prior to his retirement. However, the
concerned authorities delayed and released his gratuity
amount and arrear pension on 26.7.2010. The petitioner
herein seeks interest to be paid on gratuity amount and arrear
pension for the interim period of delay in receipt of the
gratuity amount and arrear pension.
3. There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ
petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating that
there is no statutory period of limitation and neither parties
have suffered due to this delay. It is the submission of the
petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed.
4. The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P.
17557 (W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of West
Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied upon
the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Union of India vs.
Tarsem Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on the issue of
limitation relating to payment or refixation of pay or pension
wherein the Apex Court had held that relief may be granted
in spite of delay as it does not affect the rights of the third
2
party.
5. In view of the above and after hearing the
learned Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of
Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government
of West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to pay
interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the gratuity
amount and arrear pension calculated from 01.01.2010 till
the date of actual payment. Such payment is to be made
within a period of eight weeks from the date of
communication of this order.
6. With these observations, the writ petition is
disposed of.
7. Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called
for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to
have not been admitted by the respondents.
8. There will be no order as to costs.
9. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.
( Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!