Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 58 Cal
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2021
2
06.01.2021
Court. No.22
b.das
WPA 20315 of 2014
Balaram Banerjeee
Vs.
M/s. Gladestone Lyall Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Mr. Victor Chatterjee ...for the petitioner.
Mr. M.C. Ghosh ...for the Official Liquidator.
Mr. K. J. Tiwari ...for the Respondent No.2.
The matter relates to quantification of a claim under
Section 33C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in
respect of a company which has gone into liquidation in
1991.
The petitioner herein presently a person of 87 years
old and running from pillar to post for quantification of
his claim under the abovementioned Section which has
not been done till date though a leave was granted to the
petitioner by this court on 17 th September, 2009 which is
at page 85 of the writ petition. This order dated 17 th
September, 2009 has not been challenged and no
endeavour has been made to challenge the said order by
any of the respondents.
Learned advocate for the respondent No.2, relying on
a judgment reported in 2013(7) SCC 754 and specially
paragraph 60.2, 67.3 and also paragraph 68 submits that
such quantification is to be made by the Official
Liquidator and not by the Tribunal.
Learned advocate for the Official Liquidator submits
that liquidator cannot enter into in such nitty-gritty's as
are involved in the matter of the petitioner and it is for
the Tribunal to decide.
Learned advocate for the Official Liquidator has
handed over an order dated 29 th June, 2012 passed by
this court in the liquidation proceeding being CA No.414
of 2012 in connection with CP No.39 of 1991. The copy of
the said order be kept on the record.
The matter is heard. Judgment is reserved.
(Abhijit Gangopadhyay, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!