Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dynamic Infracon Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs Howrah Municipal Corporation & ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 264 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 264 Cal
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Dynamic Infracon Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs Howrah Municipal Corporation & ... on 19 January, 2021

19.01.2021

Court No.24 s.biswas WPA 8092 of 2020 Dynamic Infracon Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Vs.

Howrah Municipal Corporation & Ors. (Through Video Conference)

Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury Mr. Dipak Dey Mr. Yash Vardhan Deora ... ... for the petitioners Mr. Sandipan Banerjee Mr. Ankit Surekha ... ... for the Howrah Municipal Corporation

The petitioners are aggrieved by the order of demolition

dated 16th September, 2020, whereby the petitioners have

been directed to demolish the unauthorised portion of the

premises being 406, G. T. Road, P.O. & P.S. Bally, Ward

No. 53.

According to the petitioners, the impugned notice does

not specifically mention the unauthorised construction

that has been carried on. The particulars given are

absolutely vague. The notice dated 3rd September, 2020

which was issued to the petitioners for stopping work

mentions that the petitioners made construction in some

portion of the building (G+2) by deviating from the

sanction plan (horizontally). No details of the alleged

deviation have been revealed.

The petitioners rely upon several judgments of the

Court on the point that unless and until the deviation is

specifically mentioned, the notice of demolition is bad.

The learned advocate representing the Howrah

Municipal Corporation submits that the petitioners in the

writ petition at paragraph nos.12 and 16 have admitted

that there has been a deviation. The Corporation contends

that the petitioners are well aware of the deviation that

they have made and accordingly, the notice was issued for

demolition of the portion, which was constructed in

deviation of the sanction plan.

Be that as it may, it appears from the notice to stop

work followed by the notice of demolition that the illegal

and unauthorised construction has not been categorically

mentioned therein. In the absence of the illegal portions

being mentioned clearly, it may be difficult for the

petitioner to identify the area where the illegal

construction has been made in deviation of the sanction

plan.

In view of the above, the instant writ petition being

WPA 8092 of 2020 is disposed of by directing the Howrah

Municipal Corporation to intimate the petitioners the

portions which have been constructed in the deviation of

the sanction plan. Till such time the illegal portions are

categorically intimated to the petitioner, the Howrah

Municipal Corporation shall not proceed with the

demolition notice issued on 16th September, 2020.

It goes without saying that the petitioners shall not

make any further construction in deviation of the sanction

plan.

Prior to proceeding with the demolition order, the

Howrah Municipal Corporation shall afford an opportunity

of hearing to the petitioner.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied

for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter