Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 112 Cal
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2021
08.01.2021 SL No.13 Court No.12 (gc) WPA 7034 of 2020 With CAN 1 of 2020
Gautam Datta Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
(Via Video Conference)
Ms. Manju Bhutoria, Mr. Jishnu Choudhury, Mr. A.K. Updhyay, Mr. Saptarshi Banerjee, Ms. Sahana Mukherjee, ...for the Petitioner.
Mr. Y.J. Dastoor, Ld. A.S.G., Mr. Sunil Singhania, Mr. Avinash Kankani, ...for the U.O.I.
This matter is placed before us in terms of the
direction by Justice Sanjib Banerjee by the Authority of the
Hon'ble the Chief Justice on 22nd December, 2020 in view
of the difference of opinion of the two learned Single Judges
in relation to the interpretation of Sections 164 and 167 of
the Companies Act, 2013.
Justice Debangsu Basak in deciding WPA 22790 of
2019 (Gautam Mehra Vs.Union of India & Ors.) noticed the
conflicting views expressed by Coordinate Benches, one of
which, namely, Sourajit Ghosh Vs. Union of India & Ors.
was decided by one of us (Soumen Sen, J.) on 30th July,
2020.
In view of the fact that one of us has expressed an
opinion which apparently is in conflict with the views
expressed in two judgments of Coordinate Benches it would
not be proper on our part to hear the matter.
On such consideration, the matter is released from
our list and shall be placed before the Hon'ble the Chief
Justice for appropriate direction.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!