Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bimal Chandra Barman vs Unknown
2021 Latest Caselaw 1532 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1532 Cal
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Bimal Chandra Barman vs Unknown on 23 February, 2021

23.02.2021 Item no.09 Court No.1

(Via Video Conference)

C.R.A. No.64 of 2020 With I. A. CRAN 1 of 2020 (Old CRAN 979 of 2020)

In the matter of: Bimal Chandra Barman @ Amal & Anr.

.... Appellants/ Petitioners Mr. Sekhar Kumar Basu, Sr. Adv, Mr. Kushal Mukherjee, Smt. Suchismita Dutta, Mr. Sayan Mukherjee ...for the Appellants

Mr. Rana Mukheree, Ld. APP Smt. Rita Dutta ...for the State

This is an application by the appellants for suspension of

sentence and grant of bail pending disposal of the appeal against

the Judgment and Order dated January 7, 2020 / January 9, 2020

passed in Sessions Case No.267 of 2013, ST No.07 (01) 2014

whereby the appellants/accused persons were sentenced to suffer

life imprisonment for the offence found to be punishable under

Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case is that the victim had taken a loan of

Rs.50,000/- from the father of the appellants. There was a delay on

the part of the victim to repay the loan and for that reason the

appellants demanded interest from the victim. The victim did not

agree to pay such interest. Accordingly, disputes arose. On the day

of the occurrence, i.e., June 11, 2012 the victim was returning

from the market on his bicycle. On the way, the appellants

intercepted him and beat him up with bamboo sticks, thereby

injuring him severely. The victim was taken to hospital by PW-4.

On June 13, 2012 the victim was shifted to another hospital where

he succumbed to the injuries on June 18, 2012.

We have heard Learned Counsel for the parties and sifted the

evidence on record. The case of the victim having taken a loan is

supported by PW-1 only, who is the wife of the victim. There are no

eye witnesses to the incident. The decision of the Trial Judge

appears to be based entirely on circumstantial evidence. It appears

that the victim, when he was admitted to the first hospital, had

made a declaration before PW-10 that the first appellant had

attacked him and inflicted injury on him. There was no statement

against the second appellant. The evidential weight of such

statement against the first appellant has to be assessed at the final

hearing of the appeal. There appears to be nothing on record as

regards the treatment administered to the victim and his condition

between June 11, 2012 and June 18, 2012 when he passed away.

On an overall assessment of the legal evidence on record and

assimilation of the evidence by the Learned Trial Court, we are of

the view that it cannot be said that the appellants do not have any

chance of succeeding in the appeal. Further, the appellants were all

along on bail during the trial and it is nobody's case that the

appellants or either of them jumped bail or breached any condition

of bail. We also keep in mind the principles laid down by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kashmira Singh v. State of

Punjab: (1977) 4 SCC 291 coupled with the fact that there is little

chance of hearing of this appeal in the new future.

For the reasons aforestated, we are of the opinion that the

appellants have made out a case for suspension of the sentence

imposed on them by the Learned Trial Judge and grant of bail

pending disposal of the appeal.

Accordingly, the appellants shall be released on bail upon

furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each

with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be a local

surety, to the satisfaction of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Dakshin Dinajpur at Balurghat on condition that they shall report

to the Officer-in-charge of the concerned Police Station once a

month till the disposal of this appeal unless otherwise ordered.

The appellants shall be present or be represented at the hearing of

the appeal.

Paper Books be prepared within four weeks from the date of

receipt of lower court records.

Let the appeal be listed for final hearing as soon as paper

books are ready.

The application being C.R.A.N. 979 of 2020 is allowed.

Urgent Photostat Certified copy of this order, if applied for, be

supplied expeditiously after complying with all necessary legal

formalities.

(Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, C.J.)

(Arijit Banerjee, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter