Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1499 Cal
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2021
19.02.2021
Item No. 22
Ct. No. 04
PG
M.A.T. 1014 of 2017
r
Jitendra Prasad
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Achin Kumar Majumdar
Mr. Pratik Majumder......for appellant
Mr. Sanajit Kr. Ghosh
Mr. Madhusudan Mukhopadhyay......for respondents
Mr. Majumdar, learned advocate appears on
behalf of appellant, who is aggrieved by judgment
dated 16th May, 2017 dismissing the writ petition. He
submits, his client was appointed in Railway
Protection Force (RPF) on 2nd June, 1977.
Memorandum dated 21st December, 2010 was issued
against his client containing the charges, mainly that
his Scheduled Tribe certificate was forged. After 33
years of service his employer acted in this manner
without material evidence on late discovery. His
certificate was scrutinised at appointment and
thereafter on every promotion given. There was clear
averment in the writ petition, by paragraph 26, that
prior to judgment dated 16 th November, 1992 of Apex
Court there was no designated Other Backward
Class. In paragraph 19 of affidavit in opposition there
is no dispute raised regarding setting up of National
Commission on Other Backward Classes pursuant to
the judgment. Forgery had not been proved.
Paucity of time intervenes. List on Tuesday
next i.e. 23rd February, 2021.
(Arindam Sinha, J.)
(Suvra Ghosh, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!