Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1423 Cal
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2021
249 12.02.2021 WPA 3739 of 2021
Dd
Ct.
15
Manoj Kr. Parua
Vs
The State West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Goutam Kumar Maity ... for the Petitioner
Ms. Tapati Samanta ... ....For the State
Affidavit of service filed in court today is kept
with the record.
The petitioner was an Assistant Teacher of a
Primary School who retired on 28.02.2009. The first
pension payment order was issued on 20.11.2009 under
the ROPA Rules, 2009, there was revision of the
pensionary and gratuity amount payable to the petitioner.
The revised pension payment order was issued on
12.09.2012 and the revised gratuity and arrear pension
amount was disbursed on 02.11.2012 in terms of ROPA,
2009. The petitioner claims interest on delayed payment
of the revised gratuity and arrear pension amount.
There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ
petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating
that there is no statutory period of limitation and neither
parties have suffered due to this delay. It is the
submission of the petitioner that accordingly the petition
should be allowed. The petitioner relies upon an order in
W.P. 17557 (W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs.
2
State of West Bengal & Ors.) wherein a coordinate
Bench had relied upon the Supreme Court judgment in
the case of Union of India vs. Tarmen Singh, reported
in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on the issue of limitation relating to
payment or refixation of pay or pension wherein the Apex
Court had held that relief may be granted in spite of delay
as it does not affect the rights of the third party.
In view of the above and after hearing the learned
Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of Pension,
Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of
West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to pay
interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the revised
gratuity and arrear pension amount calculated on and
from 1.06.2009 till the date of actual payment. Such
payment is to be made within a period of eight weeks from
the date of communication of this order.
This writ petition is, thus, disposed of.
Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called
for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed
to have not been admitted by the respondents.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.
(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!