Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1261 Cal
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2021
09.02.2021
Item No. 24
Ct. No. 04
PG
M.A.T. 83 of 2021
With
I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2021
r
Koushik Paul
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Victor Chatterjee
Mr. Barnamoy Basak......for appellant
Mr. Partha Ghosh
Mr. Ashok Prasad.......for respondents
Mr. Ghosh, learned advocate appears on
behalf of respondents. On query from Court regarding
referring appellant to an independent institution on
choice exercised by respondents, he submits, the
rules do not permit such course of action.
In circumstances of conflicting reports
regarding vision possessed by appellant, as appearing
from eye tests undergone by appellant in other eye
testing facilities, we propose to direct appellant to
once again undergo eye test at a facility of repute. We
shall make such direction on adjourned date,
awaiting submissions to be made on behalf of
respondents, on instructions received after this order.
In event respondents still cannot come up with a
choice of facility and subsequently appellant gets
himself tested at a facility directed by us giving result,
which does not corroborate the results relied upon by
respondents, we shall appropriately then decide this
appeal. We make it clear that in event further
direction for testing is required, the result will be
additional evidence in the appeal, as required to
enable us to pass judgment.
List on 15th February, 2021.
(Arindam Sinha, J.)
(Suvra Ghosh, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!