Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1086 Cal
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2021
Court No. 24 W.P.A 8248 of 2020
08.02.2021
Chiradeep Sirkar
(Item No. 20)
vs
(AB) Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Mr. Jaydip Kar
Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya
Mr. Arkaprava Sen
...for the Petitioner
Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy
Mr. Arka Nag
Mr. Subhankar Das
........ for Bidhannagar Municipality
The petitioner submits that the Bidhannagar
Municipal Corporation is raising property tax bills without
taking into consideration and in violation of the provisions
of Section 110 of the West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993 as
amended in 2009.
The petitioner relies upon a judgment passed by
the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 18th May, 2007 reported in
(2007) 6 SCC 668 in the matter of Bidhannagar (Salt
Lake) Welfare Assn. Vs. Central Valuation Board and
others and submits that the Bidhannagar Municipal
Corporation is also not acting in accordance with the
direction passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the
aforesaid matter.
The petitioner made a representation before the
Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation by a letter dated 4th
June, 2019. The petitioner complains that the said
representation has not been considered by the
Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation till date.
2
As it appears that the petitioner has already
raised his grievance with regard to fresh assessment of
property tax and the same is pending consideration at the
end of the Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation, no useful
purpose will be served by keeping the writ petition
pending.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of by
directing the respondent no.2, the Municipal
Commissioner, Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation to take
necessary steps for consideration of the representation
made by the petitioner on 4th June, 2019, strictly in
accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing
to all the necessary parties, including the petitioner, within
a period of six weeks from the date of communication of a
copy of this order. The said respondent shall pass a
reasoned order and communicate the same to all the
necessary parties, including the petitioner, immediately
thereafter.
It is made clear that this Court has not gone into
the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner and all
points are left open to be decided by the aforesaid
respondent at the time of consideration of the
representation of the petitioner.
The petitioner is directed to forward a copy of the
representation dated 4th June, 2019 to the aforesaid
respondent at the time of communicating the order of the
Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this
order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon
completion of usual legal formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!