Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1057 Cal
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2021
224 05.02.2021
Sc
WPA 2455 OF 2021
(Through Video Conference)
--------
Dipak Kanti Mitra Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Md. Yusuf Ali ... for the Petitioner
None appears for the State when the matter is called on for hearing.
Affidavit of service filed in court today is kept with the record.
The petitioner's wife was an Assistant Teacher of a Primary School who retired from service on 04.06.2009. The petitioner's wife died on 11.01.2012. The petitioner's wife had completed all pension-related formalities. The Pension Payment Order was issued on 22.03.2013. However, the concerned authorities delayed and released the arrear pension amount on 30.09.2013. The petitioner herein seeks interest to be paid on the arrear pension amount.
There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating that there is no statutory period of limitation and neither parties have suffered due to this delay. It is the submission of the petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed. The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P. 17557 (W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co- ordinate Bench had relied upon the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Union of India vs. Tarsem Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on the issue of limitation relating to payment or refixation of pay or
pension wherein the Apex Court had held that relief may be granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the rights of the third party.
In view of the above and after hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to pay interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the arrear pension amount calculated on and from 05.06.2009 till the date of actual payment.
Such payment is to be made within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.
This writ petition is disposed of, however, no order as to costs.
Since, no affidavit-in-opposition is called for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to have been denied.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.
(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!