Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6077 Cal
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2021
06.12.2021 Sl. No. 20.
Mithun Ct.No.42.
IA No: CRAN/4/2021 In CRA/108/2015
(Via Video Conference)
In the matter of : Shri Deoraj Dewan.
...Appellant.
Mr. Kalyan Kumar Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. K. Bhattacharya, Adv.
...for the appellant.
Ms. Shaila Afrin, Adv.
...Amicus Curiae.
Mr. Ranabir Roy Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Ashok Das, Adv.
...for the State.
This is an application filed on behalf of the appellant
praying for recalling of the order dated 10th September, 2021.
It is found from the order dated 10 th September, 2021
that the learned Advocate for the appellant did not appear
before this Court and Mrs. Shaila Afrin, learned Advocate was
appointed as Amicus Curiae to assist the Court.
Even when the learned Advocate for the appellant has
appeared, Court can appoint an Amicus Curiae to assist the
Court in any matter on the question of law or fact involving in a
particular proceeding.
Therefore, I do not find any reason to recall the order
dated 10th September, 2021.
However, Mr. Kalyan Kumar Chakraborty, learned
Advocate for the appellant is permitted to represent the
appellant. The learned Amicus Curiae shall assist the Court on
overall facts and circumstances of the case and laws involved.
Accordingly, CRAN 4 of 2021 is dismissed.
Argument is heard.
Judgment is reserved.
( Bibek Chaudhuri, J. )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!