Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rubi Naskar & Ors vs Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 4062 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4062 Cal
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Rubi Naskar & Ors vs Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... on 4 August, 2021
04.08.2021
  ss                               ( Via Video Conference )
                                F.M.A.T. 1393 of 2019
                                      I.A. CAN 1 of 2021

                                    Rubi Naskar & ors.
                                            Vs.
                            Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.

                   Mr. Ashique Mondal ...      For the Appellants/claimants
                   Mr. Rajesh Singh      ... For the respondent/Insurance Co.

The appeal is directed against the judgment and

order dated 16th January, 2019 passed by Learned Judge,

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fast Track, 5th Court,

Alipore, South 24 Parganas in M.A.C. Case No. 69 of

2015. The facts of the case are not in dispute. The claim

was filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act,

1988 in connection with a vehicular accident dated 11th

September, 2015.

In the instant appeal, claimants have challenged

the quantum of compensation on various grounds. It is

submitted on behalf of the appellants that the monthly

income of the victim, as considered by the learned Judge

was inadequate. Further, the claimants were not given

any amount under 'future prospect'. Lastly, claimants

pleaded that the full components of general damages were

not granted. Accordingly, it was argued that a lesser

quantum of compensation has been wrongfully awarded

by the Tribunal.

Per contra, the learned Advocate representing the

Insurance Company argues that the award is just and

reasonable and there is no further scope of enhancement

of the same.

Considering the judgements of Smt. Sarla Verma &

Ors. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., reported

in (2009) 6 SCC 121 and National Insurance Company

Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors., reported in (2017) 16 SCC

680, I find substance in the arguments of the appellants

on the point of future prospects, which ought to have

been awarded. The monthly income of Rs.4,000/- of the

deceased as mentioned by the claimants in the claim

application and also reflected in oral evidence of PW1 and

PW2 has duly been accepted by the Court below.

Appellants are also entitled to Rs.70,000/- under

collective heads of general damages.

Accordingly, the impugned award is modified and

recalculated in the manner referred hereinafter.

     Particulars                               Amount (Rs.)
Monthly Income                                     4,000/-
Annual Income                                     48,000/-

Add - 40% income for future prospects (Rs.19,200/-) 67,200/-

Less - 1/3rd for personal expenses
        (Rs.22,400/-)                            44,800/-
Multiplier (16)                                7,16,800/-
Collective General Damages                      70,000/-
Total                                         7,86,800/-

The claimants acknowledge receipt of the awarded

amount of Rs.5,62,000/- along with interest. Accordingly,

the balance enhanced sum of Rs.2,24,800/- would

become payable to the appellants by the insurance

company, together with interest assessed at the rate of 6

per cent per annum on and from the date of filing of the

claim petition within a period of 45 days from the date of

receipt of the bank account particulars of the appellants.

Learned Advocate for the appellants will forward the bank

account details of the appellants within a fortnight from

date to learned advocate for the insurance company. The

payment shall be made in the proportion decided by the

Court below.

During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant

/respondent no. 2, being the mother of the deceased died.

To put it on record, an application being CAN No. 1 of

2021 has been filed by the learned Advocate for the

claimants. It is submitted that the only surviving heirs of

the deceased mother, are already on record and arrayed

as appellant nos. 1 and 3.

Accordingly, the name of appellant no. 2 be struck

off and be substituted by appellant nos. 1 and 3. The

share of compensation of appellant no. 2 should be

equally distributed among the appellant nos. 1 and 3.

With the aforesaid directions the instant appeal is

disposed of.

In view of the disposal of this appeal, connected

applications, if any, are also disposed of. The concerned

Department is directed to tag the applications, if any,

with the main appeal.

There will be no order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of all formalities, on priority basis.

(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter