Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nandkishor Gambhirrao Deshmukh vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 1025 Bom

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1025 Bom
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Nandkishor Gambhirrao Deshmukh vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso ... on 29 January, 2026

2026:BHC-NAG:1434


     Order                                                                                     290126ba1401.25
                                                            1


                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.


                           CRIMINAL APPLICATION [BA] NO. 1401 OF 2025.
                                             Nandkishor Gambhirrao Deshmukh.
                                                       -VERSUS-
                                                   State of Maharashtra.
     Office notes, Office Memoranda of
     Coram, appearances, Court's orders                     Court's or Judge's Orders
     or directions and Registrar's orders.


                                                Shri M. Rai, Advocate for the Applicant.
                                                Shri A. Chutke, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant/State.




                                                                CORAM : M.M. NERLIKAR, J.

                                                                DATE         : JANUARY 29, 2026.


                                                Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

                                  2.            The applicant came to be arrested on 27.09.2024 in

                                  connection       with     Crime          No.247/2024     registered    with

                                  Sakharkheda Police Station, Buldhana for the offence

                                  punishable under Sections 103[1] and 115[2] of the Bhartiya

                                  Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.

                                  3.            The informant Radha Deshmukh is sister of the

                                  deceased. She has alleged that her sister, deceased Pragati got

                                  married to the applicant in the year 2013. The applicant used


    Rgd.
 Order                                                       290126ba1401.25
                              2

        to ill-treat her. They were having two children out of the

        wedlock. On 27.09.2024, the informant received a phone call

        from Ram Deshmukh, that a quarrel took place between the

        deceased and the applicant and they all need to come to her

        sister's house at Loni. While they were on the way to Loni, one

        Gajanan Deshmukh asked them to come to Sakharkheda Police

        Station. She was also informed that Pragati passed away and

        was taken to Government Hospital for postmortem. From the

        villagers she learnt that during quarrel, the applicant has

        stabbed her with a sickle. Hence, the aforesaid crime came to

        be registered.

        4.          The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that

        the applicant is in jail since 27.09.2024. He further submits

        that even if the allegations is taken as it is, the case would fall

        under exceptions 1 and 4 of Section 101 of BNS. Statement

        of minor son was recorded initially on 29.09.2023, wherein he

        has specifically stated that there was a scuffle between the

        applicant and the deceased, and the applicant has slapped her

        on cheek.    Accordingly the deceased brought a sickle, the

        applicant took the said sickle from her and inflicted blows on


Rgd.
 Order                                                        290126ba1401.25
                              3

        her person.    He further submits that out of sudden quarrel,

        the incident has taken place and there was no intention on the

        part of the applicant to commit murder of his wife. It is

        submitted that it is the deceased who had instigated the

        applicant by bringing sickle, and the deceased herself has

        handed over the same to the applicant. He states that had it

        been the intention on the part of the applicant to cause murder

        of his wife, he would have himself brought the sickle and

        inflicted blows. Even considering the fact that there is prima

        facie case, considering the fact that the applicant is in jail since

        27.09.2024, and the trial is yet to commence, the applicant

        deserves to be enlarged on bail.

        5.          The learned A.P.P. vehemently opposes the

        applicant by inviting my attention to the contents of first

        information report and the postmortem report, wherein as

        many as 9 injuries are shown, and the cause of death is shown

        as 'Hemorrhagic Shock'. He further submits that the statement

        of child witness was recorded under Section 183 of the BNS,

        which also goes to show that the applicant has inflicted blows

        on the deceased, therefore, considering the gravity of the


Rgd.
 Order                                                      290126ba1401.25
                             4

        offence and the material collected by the investigating officer

        directly implicating the present applicant, he does not deserves

        to be released on bail, and thus prayed that the application be

        rejected.

        6.          After going through the material placed on record,

        admittedly it reveals that first information report was registered

        at the instance of one Radha, who is sister of the deceased. It

        also reveals that quarrel took place between the applicant and

        the deceased on petty count, during which the applicant

        slapped her and accordingly deceased has brought sickle, and it

        appears that with the help of sickle, the applicant gave blows on

        her person, because of which she suffered serious injuries and

        succumbed to the same.

        7.          In order to ascertain the stage of the trial, status

        report of the trial from the Court below was called, from which

        it is clear that recently on 16.01.2026 charge is framed against

        the accused. Considering the report and the allegations leveled

        against the applicant, and the fact that the applicant is

        languishing in jail since 27.09.2024, coupled with the fact that

        the investigation is over and charge sheet is filed, I am inclined


Rgd.
 Order                                                     290126ba1401.25
                             5

        to grant bail to the applicant. Hence, the following order.



                                   ORDER

(i) Criminal Application is allowed and disposed of.

(ii) The applicant /accused Nandkishor Gambhirrao Deshmukh be released on regular bail in connection with Crime No.247/2024 registered with Sakharkheda Police Station, Buldhana for the offence punishable under Sections 103[1] and 115[2] of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 on his furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount.

(iii) The accused shall not enter within the territorial jurisdiction where the informant is residing, till the completion of the trial.

(iv) The accused shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, as also shall not tamper with the evidence.

(v) The accused shall provide his residential address and cell number to Police Station concerned and shall not change his place of residence without prior intimation to the Investigating Agency.

(vi) The accused shall attend each and every date of

Rgd.

Order 290126ba1401.25

trial regularly. If he fails to attend the trial for two consecutive dates, or fails to comply with the aforesaid conditions, his default would entail the State to ask for cancellation of bail.

(vii) The above observations are prima facie in nature, and restricted for the purpose of deciding this application. The Trial Court shall not get itself influenced by said observations, during the course of trial.

(viii) Misc. Applications, if any, are also disposed of.

JUDGE

Signed by: R.G. Dhuriya (RGD) Designation:Rgd.

PS To Honourable Judge Date: 29/01/2026 18:16:20

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter