Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3162 Bom
Judgement Date : 11 March, 2025
2025:BHC-NAG:2616-DB
1103WP1995-17.odt 1 Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1995 OF 2017
Manikbaba Gittikhadan Majoor Sahakari Sanstha
Maryadit, Through its President, Ramnath Baliramji
Kalsarpe, Aged about 60 years, Occupation : Private,
Having its Ofice at Mannu Apartment, J.B. Nagar,
Datala Road, Chandrapur. PETITIONER
- VERSUS -
1. State of Maharashtra, Through its Minister of
Textile, Handloom & Co-operation, Mantralaya,
Mumbai - 32.
2. State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary,
Department of Textile, Handloom & Co-operation,
Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.
3. Co-operative Commissioner & Registrar,
Co-operative Sahakari Sanstha, Pune-1. RESPONDENTS
______________________________________________________________
Shri C.B. Dharmadhikari, Counsel for the petitioner.
Shri S.M. Ghodeswar, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.
______________________________________________________________
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 11, 2025
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Clause 14 of Circular dated December 06, 2008 to the extent of it
imposes restrictions on the petitioner, a labour cooperative society, for
adopting the name commensurating to the categories of work for which it
was registered and consequent to the non-adherence of the restrictions
referred above, resulting into non-entitlement of work, is the subject
matter of challenge in the present writ petition.
1103WP1995-17.odt 2 Judgment
3. It is the case of the petitioner-Society that it was registered on
November 02, 2010 as a 'Labour Co-operative Society' and was allotted
code symbol 'L' pursuant to the Circular dated February 09, 1962. It is
claimed that the respondent no.3 has issued Circular dated December 06,
2008 thereby mandating the mention of nature of work performed by the
Society in its nomenclature in the Register of Records, failing which work
should not be allotted to such societies.
4. On similar lines, this Court has decided Writ Petition No.7842 of
2022 [Chandrapur District Gittikhadan Labour Co-operative Societies
Federation Ltd. Versus State of Maharashtra & Others ) on September 04,
2024, wherein it was agreed that irrespective of the nomenclature of the
concerned society, the work should be allotted to it.
5. As such, we direct the respondents to allot the work to the
petitioner-Society in accordance with what is provided in the amended
bye-laws and/or what has been provided in the bye-laws and not as per
the nomenclature of the society. The writ petition accordingly stands
disposed of. No costs. Pending civil application also stands disposed of.
(VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
APTE
Signed by: Apte
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 17/03/2025 14:42:49
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!