Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26477 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2024
2024:BHC-NAG:11805-DB
Judgment 1 39wp906.23.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 906/2023
Virendrasingh S/o Ramsingh Thakur,
Aged about 53 years, Occ. Service,
R/o. Thakur Niwas, Near Bhagatsingh Square,
Small Umari, Akola 444005
.... PETITIONER(S)
// VERSUS //
(1) Joint Commissioner & Vice-Chairman ,
Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee,
B-Wing, 1st Floor, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Social Justice
Department, Camp Road, Amravati 444606
(2) The Registrar,
Dr. Punjabrao Krishi Vidyapeeth,
P.O. Krishi Nagar, Akola
(3) The Associate Dean,
College of Agricultural,
Akola
.... RESPONDENT(S)
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
Mr. S.R. Narnaware, Advocate for the Petitioner(s)
Mr. H.R. Dhumale, AGP for the Respondent/State
Ms.D.Bhoyar, Adv h/f Mr. A.Sambre, Adv for Respondent No. 2
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE & SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, JJ.
OCTOBER 18, 2024
..ANSARI..
Judgment 2 39wp906.23.odt
ORAL JUDGMENT :- (PER: AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
(1) RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by
consent of learned Counsel for the respective parties.
(2) The Petition questions the decision dated 28/12/2022
passed by the Respondent No. 1 - Caste Scrutiny Committee,
Amravati rejecting the claim of the Petitioner of belonging to
Scheduled Tribe 'Thakur'.
(3) With the assistance of the learned Counsel for the
Petitioner and learned AGP, we have perused the record and the
impugned decision.
(4) The rejection of the claim, is only on the basis of two
entries one is dated 06/07/1956 which is the school admission
register regarding the father of the Petitioner i.e. Ramsingh
Bajrangsingh, in which the entry is recorded as 'Pardesi' and
another entry dated 13/06/1952 is in respect of paternal aunt of
..ANSARI..
Judgment 3 39wp906.23.odt
the Petitioner namely Pramila Bajrangsingh, in which the entry
is recorded as 'Rajput'.
(5) Learned AGP is unable to point to any other reason for
rejection of the claim apart from the affinity which has already
been held to be not of any consequence in comparison with the
old pre-constitutional entries. In the instant matter, it is not in
dispute that Bajrangsingh is the grandfather of the Petitioner
and Vimlabai was his daughter. The tree also indicates that
Bhagwantisingh was the brother of Bajrangsingh. The tree also
indicates that Ramsingh is the son of Bajrangsingh. The tree
also indicates Balbhadrasingh to be the cousin grandfather of
Bajrangsinsh. Though the impugned decision, at Paragraph No.
3 (Page No. 81), records the name of Balbhimsingh S/o
Kalusingh, however, the death report at Record Page No. 117 of
the R & P indicates that his name is Balbhadrasingh who had
passed away on 05/02/1950 and belongs to the 'Thakur'
community. Though Entry No. 17 in Paragraph No. 3 of the
impugned decision (Page No. 81) records the name of
Kamlaprasad S/o Dhuniasingh whose caste is recorded as
'Thakur' in his service book, his correct name is Kamtaprasad,
..ANSARI..
Judgment 4 39wp906.23.odt
as is discernible from Page No. 126 of the R & P. It is perhaps
because of the incorrect recording of the name that the remark
has been given that his name is not in the genealogical tree.
(6) The relevant pre-constitutional entries, therefore, would
be as under:-
अ.क्र कागदपत्राचे स्वरुप कागदत्रावरील जमात दिनांक अर्जदारा व्यक्तीचे नांव शी नाते ११ नगरपालिका, बजरंगसिंह ठाकु र ६.१२.१९५२ आजोबा अकोला सेवापट
१२ मृत्यू अहवाल बलभिमसिंग ठाकु र ५.२.१९५० कालूसिंग १३ जन्माचा उतारा बजरंगसिंग ठाकू र १३.८.१९४१ आजोबा दुनियासिंग यांना एक मुलगी (विमल) झाल्याची नोंद १४ शाळा सोडण्याचे विमलाबाई ठाकु र १२.४.१९४८ आत्या प्रमाणपत्र बजरंगसिंग १५ जन्माचा उतारा भगवंतीदिन ठाकू र १८.५.१९३९ चुलत दुनिया यांना एक आजोबा मुलगा (रामचेस) झाल्याची नोंद १७ सेवापट कमलाप्रसाद ठाकु र १९४४ वंशावळीत दुनियासिंह नाव नाही
..ANSARI..
Judgment 5 39wp906.23.odt
(7) The above position, therefore, would indicate that the
pre-constitutional documents, unequivocally record the
ancestors of the Petitioner as belonging to 'Thakur' community,
which has been declared as a Scheduled Tribe under the Entry
No. 44.
(8) In view of what has been held in Anand Vs. Committee
for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claim, (2012) 1 SCC
113, the entries in the pre-constitutional documents have to be
given preference, we find that the old pre-constitutional
documents record the Petitioner's ancestors as belonging to
'Thakur' community, on account of which, the denial of the
claim by the Committee based upon two entries of the years
1952 and 1956 by ignoring the earlier entries cannot be
sustained and the same is hereby quashed and set aside. The
Petition is, therefore, allowed. It is declared that the Petitioner
belongs to the Scheduled Tribe 'Thakur', Entry No. 44 in the
Presidential Order, 1950. The Respondent No. 1 - Caste Scrutiny
Committee is directed to grant certificate of validity to the
Petitioner within a period of three weeks from today. R. & P. be
returned back to the learned AGP.
..ANSARI..
Judgment 6 39wp906.23.odt
Rule is made absolute in the above terms. Pending
Application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
Signed by: A.P. ANSARI ..ANSARI..
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 19/10/2024 17:21:25
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!