Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Narayandas Govardhan Mohnani vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 26751 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26751 Bom
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2024

Bombay High Court

Narayandas Govardhan Mohnani vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps ... on 11 November, 2024

Author: Vinay Joshi

Bench: Vinay Joshi

2024:BHC-NAG:12460-DB




               Judgment                                                       3 apl 1648.24

                                                     1

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY :
                               NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
                             CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 1648/2024

                   Narayan Govardhandas Mohnani,
                   Aged about 66 yrs., Occ. Business,
                   R/o. Wanjari Nagar, Nagpur.
                                                              ...   APPLICANT
                                                                     (accused)

                                               VERSUS
              1.   State of Maharashtra,
                   through Police Station Officer,
                   Police Station Koradi, Nagpur.

              2.   Riya w/o. Kamlesh Mohnani,
                   aged about 36 yrs., Occ. Housewife,
                   R/o. 27, Lalaoli, opposite Bank of
                   Maharashtra, Kamptee, Nagpur.

                                                              ... NON-APPLICANTS
                                      ---------------------------------
                               Mr. S.G. Shukla, Advocate for applicant.
                           Mrs. M. Deshmukh, APP for non-applicant No.1.
                          Mr. H.S. Chavhan, Advocate for non-applicant No.2
                                     ----------------------------------
                                    CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND
                                                   ABHAY J. MANTRI JJ.
                                    DATE      : 11.11.2024.


              ORAL JUDGMENT (PER VINAY JOSHI, J.) :

Heard.

2. Admit.

Judgment 3 apl 1648.24

3. This is an application seeking to quash criminal

prosecution namely RCC No. 3605/2016 arising out of Crime No.

176/2016 registered with Police Station Koradi, Nagpur for the

offence punishable under Sections 354 of the Indian Penal Code on

account of mutual settlement. Accused is father-in-law of the

informant lady. The informant got married with the son of accused in

the year 2014. and resumed for cohabitation. On 20.08.2016, the

informant and accused were alone at their resident. In such situation,

the accused made physical advance by touching her person as well as

tried to touch her chest improperly. On the basis of such happening,

report has been lodged. The Police carried investigation and on

completion filed charge-sheet. The Trial Court has recorded evidence

of six witnesses so far.

4. There are some other parallel proceeding in between

informant and her husband. The informant has filed application

under Section 12 of the Protection of Woman from Domestic

Violence Act, 2012 and application seeking maintenance. As against

this, the husband has also filed proceeding for divorce. The parties Judgment 3 apl 1648.24

have entered into compromise before the Family Court. The copy of

consent terms of settlement is placed on record. The parties have

settled the sever matrimonial ties in permanency. The husband has

agreed to pay sum of Rs. 10,00,000/-. It was one of the condition of

settlement that the existing criminal prosecution would be disposed of

by way of quashing.

5. The informant is present before us who has been identified

by her counsel Mr. Chavhan. She has filed reply stating about her no

objection to quash the proceeding. The informant lady, on our query

affirmed about settlement and gave her no objection to quash the

proceeding. True, the criminal case is pending since 2016 and till date

evidence of six witnesses has been recorded. The matter has

progressed, however there are no limitations on the inherent powers

of this Court, if the quashing would secure ends of justice. It was a

domestic dispute, in which report has been lodged by daughter-in-law

against her father-in-law. The offence cannot be termed as heinous or

anti-social. The matter has been settled between the parties by

arriving on compromise. Having regard to the said fact, we deem it fit Judgment 3 apl 1648.24

to exercise our inherent powers. The applicant has also expressed his

willingness to deposit sum of Rs. 20,000/- towards cost for rotating

State machinery for years together.

6. In view of above, the application is allowed. We hereby

quash and set side criminal prosecution namely RCC No. 3605/2016

arising out of Crime No. 176/2016 registered with Police Station

Koradi, Nagpur for the offence punishable under Sections 354 of the

Indian Penal Code on account of mutual settlement.

7. The applicant shall deposit sum of Rs. 20,000/- to the

High Court Bar Association, Nagpur within two weeks from today.

8. Application stands dispose of in above terms.

9. Stand over to 25.11.2024 for noting compliance.

                                       (ABHAY J. MANTRI J.)               (VINAY JOSHI, J.)
                            Gohane




Signed by: Mr. J. B. Gohane
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge
Date: 14/11/2024 14:50:33
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter