Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Asif Khan Sadique Khan vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 2786 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2786 Bom
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2024

Bombay High Court

Asif Khan Sadique Khan vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 30 January, 2024

Author: Vibha Kankanwadi

Bench: Vibha Kankanwadi

2024:BHC-AUG:2290-DB

                                           1         941wp11486.21 Judgment



                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                               BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             WRIT PETITION NO. 11486 OF 2021

               Asif Khan Sadique Khan,
               Age; 46 years, Occ; Service,
               B.M.Jain Urdu Primary School,
               Pratap Nagar, Jalgaon,
               Tq. & Dist. Jalgaon,
               Resient of Shahu Nagar, Jalgaon.
                                                                 ....Petitioner
                       VERSUS

               1. The State of Maharashtra
                  Through Secretary,
                  Sports and Education Department,
                  Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400 032.

               2. The Education Officer (Primary)
                  Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon.

               3. The President,
                  Iqra Education Society, Jalgaon,
                  C/o; Iqra H.J. Thim College,
                  Mehrun, Jalgaon.

               4. The Head Master,
                  B.M. Jain Urdu Primary School,
                  Pratapnagar, Jalgaon,
                  Tq. & Dist. Jalgaon.                   .....Respondents.

                                             .....
                    Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. PATIL JITENDRA V
                       AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. S.K.SHIRSE
                  Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : MS. KUTTI CHOUDHARY
                                       CHAITALI R.
                    Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 : Mr. KAZI S.S.
                                             .....
                              2            941wp11486.21 Judgment



                       CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI &
                               S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.

                        DATE : 30th JANUARY, 2024.



ORAL JUDGMENT : ( PER - SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.)

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the

consent of parties taken up for final hearing.

2. The petitioner seeks salary in the pay scale of

Rs. 4500-7000 from the year 2005 onwards.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that he has been

working with the respondent No. 4-School since 09.06.2005.

Permanent approval has been granted to him on 21.08.2007. At

the time of his appointment, the respondent-school was unaided

and,therefore, the entire responsibility of payment of salary to

him rested squarely on the management. It is undisputed that

since September 2016 the school is in receipt of 20% grant in

aid. Since December 2020, the school is in receipt of 40% grant

in aid. Accordingly petitioner's salaries are being disbursed by

the management in accordance with the grant in aid sanctioned 3 941wp11486.21 Judgment

from time to time. The issue is therefore with regard to payment

of 100% salary by the management during the years 2005 till

August 2016, 80% salary from September 2016 to November

2020 and 60% salary from December 2020 onwards, as he has

not been shifted to 100% grant post.

4. We must note at the outset that the present petition

has been filed on 03.10.2021 claiming arrears of salary from the

year 2005. The prayer is thus clearly time barred. However,

since payment of salary is a matter of continuous cause of

action, the petition cannot be dismissed only on the ground of

delay and laches. Following the decision of the Apex Court in

the case of Union of India and another Vs. Tarsem Singh

reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648, if the claim of the petitioner is

found to be meritorious, the arrears are required to be restricted

to three years prior to filing of the writ petition.

5. Under the provision of Rule 7 read with Schedule

of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Condition of

Service) Regulation Rules, 1981 (for short "Rules of 1981"), it is

liability of the school management to pay salary to the petitioner 4 941wp11486.21 Judgment

as prescribed in Schedule C. Mr. Kazi, learned counsel

appearing for the school management does not dispute the

liability of the management to pay salary as prescribed in

Schedule C of the Rules of 1981.

6. In the light of the position emerging before us, we

partly allow the petition by passing following order.

ORDER

A. The respondent-management shall pay salary and allowances to the petitioner in the pay scale prescribed in Schedule C of the Rules of 1981 with effect from 03.10.2018 onwards i. e. three (03) years prior to filing of the petition.

B. The arrears of said salary be paid to the petitioner by deducting the amount already paid.

C. Such arrears arising out of salary and allowances be paid to the petitioner within a period of four (04) months from today.

D. The writ petition is partly allowed. Rule is made absolute in above terms. There shall be no order as to costs.




( S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR )             (SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI )
        JUDGE                               JUDGE

mahajansb/
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter