Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rani Shahaji Shinde And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 2483 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2483 Bom
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2024

Bombay High Court

Rani Shahaji Shinde And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... on 25 January, 2024

                                      1                    904-WP-8832-23.odt



         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                      WRIT PETITION NO. 8832 OF 2023

                 RANI SHAHAJI SHINDE AND OTHERS
                              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
                                 ...
        Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Shrikant G. Kawade
         AGP for Respondents No.1 and 2 : Mrs. M. L. Sangit
    Advocate for Respondents No.3 to 5 : Mr. Bhausaheb B. Bhise
          Advocate for Respondent No.6 : Mr. D. K. Chavan
  Advocate for Respondent No.7 : Mr. J. J. Patil h/f. Mr. S. R. Zambare
                                 ...
                                     CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.
                                          DATE     : 25-01-2024
  PER COURT :-

1. Respondent No.6 has filed affidavit-in-reply and documents on the facts and supplying the information to the complainant. However, he find that he was not party before the subordinate authorities. Then, the question is how he could be the party to the present petition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he had supplied the information of C.E.O. Hence, he was a necessary party. Respondent No.6 was the Village Development Officer (Gramsevak) and a public servant. He has to obey the orders of Superior. Therefore, mere supplying the information to the Superior Officer would not make him a necessary party. Unfortunately, he argued with full force, but his arguments were futile as he was never the party to any proceedings. Hence, respondent No.6 is deleted from the petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner to make necessary amendment, forthwith.

4. Reserved the petition for judgment.

( S. G. MEHARE, J. ) rrd

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter