Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishal S/O. Sukhdevrao Ghodeswar vs The State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Rana Pratap ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 2234 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2234 Bom
Judgement Date : 24 January, 2024

Bombay High Court

Vishal S/O. Sukhdevrao Ghodeswar vs The State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Rana Pratap ... on 24 January, 2024

Author: Vinay Joshi

Bench: Vinay Joshi

2024:BHC-NAG:1122-DB
                                                                       40.apl46.2024jud.odt




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

                       CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 46 OF 2024

              Vishal S/o Sukhdevrao Ghodeswar
              Aged : 30 years, Occ.: Private Job,
              R/o. Murjitapur Khedkar,                           ... Applicant
              Murtizapur Bramhi, Akola - 444106

                                 Versus
           1. The State of Maharashtra,
              Through Police Station Officer,
              Ranapratap Nagar Police Station,
              Nagpur

           2. XYZ
              FIR No.579/2023
              Police Station Rana Pratap Nagar,                ... Non-applicants
              Nagpur
              Tah. & Dist. Nagpur


          Mr. R.D. Hazare, Advocate for applicant.
          Mr. M.K. Pathan, APP for non-applicant No.1.
          Mr. I.H. Baksh, Advocate for non-applicant No.2.

                                    CORAM :           VINAY JOSHI, AND
                                                      SMT. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
                                    DATE          :   24.01.2024


          ORAL JUDGMENT: (PER: Vinay Joshi,J)

Heard finally by consent of both the learned counsel for the parties.

PAGE 1 OF 4

40.apl46.2024jud.odt

(2) Admit.

(3) This is an application seeking to quash FIR in Crime

No.579/2023 registered with Ranapratap Nagar Police Station, Nagpur

for the offence punishable under Sections 376 of the Indian Penal Code

on merits as well as on account of settlement.

(4) The informant is a grownup lady aged about 29

years who has lodged a report which made police to register a crime

and investigate. It is informant's case that through the matrimonial

website, she got acquainted with the applicant. Both frequented with

each other and went to a lodging house at Nagpur where they stayed

for two days. It is informant's case that the applicant assured her to

marry and under said pretext established sexual relations. She stated

that later on the applicant did not respond, therefore, the report.

(5) Both have appeared before us and stated that under

miscommunication, crime has been registered but, they have decided

to marry with each other. Both have filed affidavit to that effect.

Moreover, the informant lady has filed a reply stating about settlement

and her no objection.

PAGE 2 OF 4

40.apl46.2024jud.odt

(6) Apart from the settlement, we have examined the

available material to see the existence of a prima facie case.

Undoubtedly, the informant is well educated grown-up lady. Both

have stayed in a lodging house for two days, for which, there is no

dispute. The informant never ventilated the grievance about the

alleged act of sexual intercourse on promise to marry. The contents of

the police report itself discloses that after the occurrence the applicant

along with his father went to the informant's house expressing his

desire to marry. It appears that, however, thereafter, the applicant's

mobile was unreachable that is why the report has been lodged. The

contents of the FIR discloses that they were in a relationship. It is not

a case where we could say that under a false pretext, consent was

obtained because, after relations, the applicant with his father went for

settlement of marriage. It is evident that during the meantime his cell

phone was unreachable that is why the report has been lodged under

frustration. Moreover, during statement under Section 164 of the Code

of Criminal Procedure, the informant stated that out of

misunderstanding, she had lodged a report.

(7) It is evident from the above material that though

they had relationship, however, it was not under the false pretext of

PAGE 3 OF 4

40.apl46.2024jud.odt

marriage. There is no material to infer the act of applicant amounting

to obtaining consent by deceitful means. In these circumstances,

continuation of prosecution amounts to abuse of the process of the

Court. Even otherwise since both are ready to marry with each other

the continuation of the trial may become an obstacle in their

relationship.

(8) In view of above, the application is allowed. We

hereby quash and set aside the FIR in Crime No. 579/2023 registered

with Ranapratap Nagar Police Station, Nagpur, for the offence

punishable under Sections 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

(9) The criminal application stands disposed of

accordingly.

                              [VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.]                     [VINAY JOSHI, J.]


                     Prity




Signed by: Mrs. Prity Gabhane                                                          PAGE 4 OF 4
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge
Date: 30/01/2024 10:20:44
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter