Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashish S/O. Satish Shivankar And Others vs State Of Mah. Thr. Ps Ajni Nagpur And ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 1373 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1373 Bom
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2024

Bombay High Court

Ashish S/O. Satish Shivankar And Others vs State Of Mah. Thr. Ps Ajni Nagpur And ... on 19 January, 2024

Author: Vinay Joshi

Bench: Vinay Joshi

2024:BHC-NAG:921-DB


                                                             1                               2.wp.49.24 & 50.24-J.odt



                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

                                       CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 49/2024
                                                      AND
                                       CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 50/2024


               CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 49/2024

                1. Ashish S/o. Satish Shivankar,
                   Aged about 37 years, Occu. Private.
                2. Nandani W/o. Hitesh Meghani,
                   Aged about 35 years, Occu. Household.
                3. Asha W/o. Satish Shivankar,
                   Aged about 60 years, Occu. Household.
                    All 1 to 3 are R/o. Plot No.88,
                    Empress Mills Colony, Ajni, Nagpur.
                4. Nilay S/o. Kishore Itlay,
                   Aged about 35 years,
                   Occ. Profession (Advocate),
                   R/o. 11/07 M.I.G. Near Hanuman Temple,
                   Rana Pratap Nagar, Nagpur.             ... PETITIONERS

                               ...VERSUS...

                1. State of Maharashtra
                   through Police Station, Ajni, Nagpur.
                2. Mrs. Seema W/o. Sagar Shivankar,
                    Aged about 32 years, Occu. Household,
                    R/o. Sneh Nagar, Plot No.75, Nagpur.                          ... RESPONDENTS
               ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Mr. V. V. Bharadwaj, Advocate for Petitioner.
               Mr. A. B. Badar, A.P.P. for Respondent/State.
               Mr. Y. S. Jaiswal, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
               -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 AND

               CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 50/2024

                1. Mr. Satish S/o. Virchandra Shivankar,
                   Aged about 69 years, Occu. Private.
                                               2                               2.wp.49.24 & 50.24-J.odt



 2. Mr. Sagar S/o. Satish Shivankar,
    Aged about 34 years, Occu. Private.
 3. Mrs. Seema W/o. Sagar Shivankar,
    Aged about 34 years, Occu. Household.
     All 1 to 3 are R/o. C/o. R. N. Pidurkar,
     New Sneh Nagar, Plot No.75,
                                                                   ... PETITIONERS
     Post Pratap Nagar, Nagpur.

                ...VERSUS...

 1. State of Maharashtra
    through Police Station, Ajni, Nagpur.

 2. Mr. Ashish S/o. Satish Shivankar,
     Aged about 37 years, Occu. Private,
     R/o. Plot No.88, Empress Mills Colony,
     Ajni, Nagpur.                                                 ... RESPONDENTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Y. S. Jaiswal, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. A. B. Badar, A.P.P. for Respondent/State.
Mr. V. V. Bharadwaj, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND
                                      MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
                              DATED :- 19.01.2024

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : VINAY JOSHI, J.):-

1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by

consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. Both petitions are for quashing the criminal prosecutions which

have been filed against each other. Since most of the parties are one and

the same, for the sake of convenience, we have taken them together.

Particularly, it was a family dispute, which has been settled, hence,

quashing is sought in both petitions on account of settlement.

3 2.wp.49.24 & 50.24-J.odt

3. Criminal Writ Petition No.49/2024 has been filed by four

accused seeking to quash the First Information Report vide Crime

No.165/2022 registered with Police Station, Ajni, District Nagpur along

with Regular Criminal Case No.2566/2022, which was initiated at the

instance of respondent No.2 Seema.

4. Criminal Writ Petition No.50/2024 has been filed by three

accused seeking to quash the First Information Report vide Crime

No.166/2022 registered with Police Station, Ajni, District Nagpur along

with Summary Criminal Case No.1996/2022, which was initiated at the

instance of respondent No.2 Ashish.

5. It is informed that in both the proceedings investigation is

complete and charge sheet has been filed. However, no charges/plea has

been framed/recorded by the Trial Court.

6. Crime No.165/2022 has been registered at the instance of

informant Seema against her brother-in-law, mother-in-law and other

relatives. She alleges that on the date of occurrence, petitioner No.4 Nilay

outraged her modesty whilst the rest has abused her. In Crime

No.166/2022, the informant Ashish alleges that at relevant time, the

petitioners, who are his father and other relatives have abused him in filthy

language as well as caused hurt and gave threats.

4 2.wp.49.24 & 50.24-J.odt

7. The parties are closely related to each other. Lodgement of the

First Information Report was outcome of the property dispute. With the aid

and intervention of the relatives, the matter has been amicably settled. In

pursuance of the settlement, the petitioner Ashish has executed registered

gift deed in favour of his brother Sagar. Since the property dispute was

resolved, both informants Seema and Ashish decided to put an end to the

criminal prosecution. In pursuance of that, both have filed affidavits in

respective petitions stating about settlement and their no objection to go on

with the prosecution. Both informants are present before us. They are

identified by their respective Counsel. They have agreed about the

settlement, filing of reply and stated about their no objection to quash the

proceedings.

8. Apparently, the parties are closely related to each other. Out of

property dispute, rival complaints have been filed. The matter has been

settled by making certain adjustments relating to immovable property,

which was approvable to all. Since none of the informant is interested to go

on with the prosecution, there is no purpose in continuation of the criminal

cases. The respective offences cannot be termed as heinous and antisocial.

Rather the interest of justice would be secured by way of disposing of both

the criminal prosecutions. Since the police machinery has invoked for

settling of private property dispute, the respective petitioners expressed to

deposit costs of Rs.10,000/- in each petition.

5 2.wp.49.24 & 50.24-J.odt

9. In view of above, following order :

i. Criminal Writ Petition No.49/2024 is allowed.

ii. We hereby quash and set aside the First Information Report

vide Crime No.165/2022 registered with Police Station, Ajni,

District Nagpur for the offences punishable under Sections

354, 323, 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code

along with related Criminal Proceedings bearing Regular

Criminal Case No.2566/2022.

iii. The petitioner shall deposit some of Rs.10,000/- within one

week with the High Court Bar Association, Nagpur.

iv. Criminal Writ Petition No.50/2024 is allowed.

v. We hereby quash and set aside the First Information Report

vide Crime No.166/2022 registered with Police Station, Ajni,

District Nagpur for the offences punishable under Sections

294, 323, 506 of the Indian Penal Code along with related

Criminal Proceedings bearing Summary Criminal Case

No.1996/2022.

vi. The petitioner shall deposit some of Rs.10,000/- within one

week with the High Court Bar Association, Nagpur.

6 2.wp.49.24 & 50.24-J.odt

10. Rule is made absolute in the above terms.

11. The matter be fixed on 31.01.2024 for noting compliance.

                             (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.)                       (VINAY JOSHI, J.)




                             RGurnule




Signed by: Mrs. R.M. MANDADE
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge
Date: 23/01/2024 18:06:11
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter