Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Narhari Narayan Satam @ Pankaj vs State Of Maharashtra
2023 Latest Caselaw 10962 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10962 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2023

Bombay High Court
Narhari Narayan Satam @ Pankaj vs State Of Maharashtra on 23 October, 2023
Bench: Nitin B. Suryawanshi
2023:BHC-AS:32034

                                                                        19-IA-1038-2023 (CR).doc




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1038 OF 2023
                                                IN
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 739 OF 20232

                    Narhari Narayan Satam @ Pankaj                  ...Applicant
                         Versus
                    The State Of Maharashtra                        ...Respondent

                    Mr. Jagdish G. Shetty, Advocate for the Applicant.
                    Mrs. M. H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent-State.



                                           CORAM   : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.
                                           DATE    : 23rd OCTOBER 2023

                    PC.:

1. The applicant is convicted by learned Additional

Sessions Judge & Special Judge under MCOC/NIA/POTA,

Greater Mumbai in MCOC Special Case No.07 of 2015, under

Sections 120-B, 387 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code,

1860 and Sections 3(1)(ii), 3(2) and 3(4) of the Maharashtra

Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 and sentenced to suffer

10 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay total fne of

Rs.15,05,000/- is imposed on the applicant.

2. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that

sentence imposed on the applicant is short term. He further

submits that exorbitant fne amount is imposed on the

applicant and applicant is not in a position to deposit the fne

D.A.ETHAPE P.A. .... 1

19-IA-1038-2023 (CR).doc

amount. He relies on the decision of this Court (Coram :

Prakash D. Naik, J.) in Criminal Application No.1602 of 2018

and connected matters in Criminal Appeal No. 161 of 2018

wherein the sentence of payment of fne of Rs.5,00,000/- was

relaxed. He further submits that, there is non-compliance of

Rule 15(3)(b), which is held to be mandatory by Apex Court

in the case of Bharatbhai @ Jimi Premchandbhai Vs. State of

Gujarat (2003) ALL MR (Cri) 164 (S.C.). He also relied on

the decision of Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal

(Crl) No. 4633 of 2021 wherein considering the fact that

convicts has undergone 8 years of actual sentence and it was

held that bail would be the rule. Reliance is also placed on the

decision of Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 1562 of

2021 (arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 8647 of 2021) wherein out

of ten years sentence, convicts has undergone eight years and

fve days of imprisonment and therefore, bail was granted.

His suspension of sentence was suspended.

3. Learned APP on the other hand strenuously opposed

prayer stating that applicant is convicted under MCOC Act

and therefore, is not entitled for bail. He stated that, bail may

be heard fnally.

4. Since the applicant has undergone substantive sentence

D.A.ETHAPE P.A. .... 2

19-IA-1038-2023 (CR).doc

of eight years and eight months, appeal of applicant is already

admitted but the same is not likely to be heard in near future,

applicant has made out a case for suspension of sentence. In

Criminal Application No.1602 of 2018 and connected matters

in Criminal Appeal No. 161 of 2018 in similar facts, this Court

relaxed the sentence of payment of fne amount of Rs.

5,00,000/- by directing him to pay 50,000/- on each count. In

this view of the matter, applicant is entitled for the same

relief. Hence, the following order:-

(i) Interim Application No.1038 of 2023 is allowed;

(ii) Substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed on the

applicant vide judgment and order dated 31 st May 2022

passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge

under MCOC/NIA/POTA, Greater Mumbai in MCOC Special

Case No.07 of 2015 is suspended during the pendency of

Appeal.

(iii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on his

furnishing PR bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with one

solvent surety in the like amount.

(iv) Sentence of payment of fne of Rs. 5 lakhs on each

conviction under Section 3(1)(ii), 3(2) and 3(4) of MCOC Act

D.A.ETHAPE P.A. .... 3

19-IA-1038-2023 (CR).doc

is relaxed and the applicant is directed to deposit fne of

Rs.50,000/- on each count within a period of eight weeks from

the date of his release.

(v) It is clarifed that the relaxation for payment of fne is

granted pending appeal and it is subject to the decision in the

appeal challenging order of conviction.

(vi) Applicant shall pay fne of Rs. 5,000/- for conviction

under Sections 120-B, 387 of the IPC immediately before his

release on bail.

(vii) Applicant shall attend concerned Police Station once in

a month on frst Sunday until further orders.

(viii) Applicant shall furnish his present address and

cellphone number with the Investigating Offcer.




                               (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




 D.A.ETHAPE P.A.                                                     .... 4





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter