Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11442 Bom
Judgement Date : 7 November, 2023
2023:BHC-NAG:16358-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 445 OF 2023
Firoz Chand Khan Pathan, Covict
No.C/9049, Aged 36 years, Occ. Nil,
Confined at Central Prison, Amravati.
... PETITIONER
VERSUS
1. Deputy Inspector General of Prison,
Eastern Region, Nagpur.
2. The Superintendent, Open Prison,
Morshi.
3. The Superintendent, Central Prison,
Amravati.
... RESPONDENTS
_____________________________________________________________
Corrected as per Smt. Shweta P. Chavhan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Court's order dated Ms. Tripathi, Addl.P.P. for the State.
07.11.2023. ______________________________________________________________
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND M.W. CHANDWANI, JJ.
DATED : 26.10.2023.
ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per : Vinay Joshi, J.)
RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith.
2. The petitioner has been convicted for the offence
punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) vide
judgment and order dated 30.03.2015 and he is serving the sentence.
The petitioner was transferred from the Open Prison, Morshi to the
Central Prison, Amravati which is impugned herein.
3. The respondent no.2 has filed a reply stating that the
petitioner was caught red handed while accepting articles of food from
outsider, which is in contravention of Rule 13(e) of the Maharashtra
Prisons (Discipline) Rules, 1963. The respondent has also produced the
copies of the statement showing that there was such a misconduct.
According to the respondent, on account of said misconduct, on
administrative ground and for security purpose, he has been transferred
from Open Prison, Morshi to the Close Prison, Amravati. Chapter II of
the Statutory Rules provides that a prisoner who has been transferred
from Open Prion to Close Prison shall not be normally resent to Open
Prison. The alleged act was committed in the month of April, 2023 and
since 07.04.2023 the petitioner is in Close Prison.
4. We do not see any provision precluding to reconsider the
petitioner's urge for re-transfer to the Open Prison nor such a provision
is pointed out. Considering the reason for retransfer, we are not
inclined to interfere in the process of retransfer. However, the
petitioner's case for transfer to Open Prion can be reconsidered after
gap of one year from his transfer to Close Prison.
5. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of.
(M.W. CHANDWANI, J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.)
Trupti
Signed by: Trupti D. Agrawal
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge
Date: 09/11/2023 15:10:59
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!