Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5249 Bom
Judgement Date : 7 June, 2023
2023:BHC-AS:15022
Gokhale 1 of 3 3-ia-4116-22
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4116 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4533 OF 2018
Malti G. Yeshirao ..Applicant
Versus
Mahendra Rajaram Pawar & Ors. ..Respondents
__________
Ms. Medha Jondhale a/w. Anand Jondhale a/w. Rajnandini
Jondhale a/w. Harshvardhan Shinde a/w. Upendra Pandey i/b.
Jondhale and Co. for Applicant.
Mr. M. G. Patil, APP for State/Respondent No.1.
__________
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE : 7 JUNE 2023 PC :
1. This application is filed with following prayers:
"(a) It is humble prayed that it is necessary that such kind of Criminals must not escape from the clutches of law who has conspired to misled the administration of the Honorable Court in the administration of Justice third attempt/third time to dismiss case against them and it is humble prayed to take a strong suomoto action against Petitioners/Accused 1 to 5 under appropriate section of I.P.C. and direct them to pay compensation of Rs.7,00,000/- for financially and mentally since 12 years, in interest of justice.
(b) It is humble prayed to this Honorable Court to direct the Registrar of Bombay High Court to file
2 of 3 3-ia-4116-22
an F.I.R. against petitioners 1 to 5, U/s. 340 of Cr.p.c. for committing offences under section 193, 196, 198, 199, 200, 209 of I.P.C. for presenting false evidence, knowing well and believing to be false to this Honorable Court Third time, to quash 3 Judgments to dismiss case against them in interest of justice.
(c) Any other relief which this Honorable Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in interest of justice."
2. This application is filed in the main Criminal Writ
Petition No. 4533 of 2018 which is preferred by the original
accused for quashing of the proceeding initiated by the applicant.
The applicant, in this application, at the highest can pray for
intervention in the W.P.No.4533 of 2018. The reliefs claimed in this
particular application are beyond the scope of intervention in the
main petition. Therefore, I am not inclined to grant the relief asked
for in the present form; as mentioned in the prayer clause of this
application. It is not possible to entertain this application.
3. The Application is dismissed.
4. If the Applicant has any real cause for seeking the relief
in the nature of prayers made in this application, it is open for the
3 of 3 3-ia-4116-22
Applicant to adopt appropriate separate proceedings in accordance
with law.
5. With these observations, the Interim application is
disposed of.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!