Saraswati Maruti Mule And Ors vs Shankar Shivram Mule And Anr
2023 Latest Caselaw 75 Bom

                                                                          8-cas-957-2016.doc
Sonali

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                             CIVIL APPLICATION NO.957 OF 2016
                                            IN
                               SECOND APPEAL NO.516 OF 2017

         Saraswati Maruti Mule & Ors.                               ...Applicants
             Versus
         Shankar Shivram Mule & Anr.                                ...Respondents


         Mr. Vaibhav R. Gaikwad, for the Applicants.

         Mr. Pradeep S. Gole, for Respondent No.1.

                                     CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED : 3rd JANUARY 2023 P.C. :

1. By separate order dated 3rd January 2023, the Second

Appeal is admitted on the substantial questions of law framed

therein.

2. By this Civil Application, relief is sought to stay the

execution of Judgment and Decree dated 5th October 2015

passed by the learned District Judge-6, Satara in Regular Civil

Appeal No.229 of 2011.

3. There is admission in the written statement of the

Appellants, who are the original Defendants. The said

admission is to the following effect:-

ß3½ ;kckcrhr [kjh ifjfLFkrh v'kh vkgs dh] oknh o

8-cas-957-2016.doc Sonali

izfroknh ;kaP;kr lu 1983 iwohZ rksaMh okVi gksÅu R;kps Lej.kkFkZ fVi.kh oknh o izfroknh;kauh rkjh[k [email protected]@1983 jksth dLr Bsoys vkgs- lnj Lej.kkFkZ fVi.khizek.ks oknh o izfroknh ;kaP;k fg';kl vkysY;k feGdrhP;kckcrph ekfgrh [kkyhyizek.ks vkgs-

flVh lOgsZ uacj 656 Eg.kts fQ;kZnhps dye ¼1½ ¼c½ e/;s o.kZu dsysyh feGdr gh oknhP;k fg';kl ns.;kr vkyh- rlsp flVh lOgsZ uacj 656 Eg.kts fQ;kZnhps dye ¼1½ ¼v½ e/;s o.kZu dsysyh feGdrhiSdh if'pesdMhy [kqyh tkxk R;kps rksaM ¼nf{k.k½ iwoZ if'pe 20 QwV :an o nf{k.kksRrj iwoZ ykach 90 QwV o if'pe rksaM 60 QwV lnj [kqY;k tkxsps {ks= 1600 pkSjl QwV brdh tkxk oknhl ns.;kr vkyh- rlsp flVh lOgsZ uacj 657 Eg.kts fQ;kZnhps dye ¼1½ ¼v½ e/;s o.kZu dsysyh feGdrhiSdh if'pesdMhy oknhP;k fg';kl vkysyh tkxk lksMwu mjysyh tkxk gh izfroknhP;k fg';kl ns.;kr vkyh- rlsp flVh lOgsZ uacj 571 gh feGdrizfroknhP;k fg';kl ns.;kr vkyh-

ojhy[kqyk'kkoLr oknh o izfroknh ;kaP;kr iwohZp okVi >kys vkgs gh ckc fnlwu ;sbZy- R;keqGs okViklkBh oknhus dsysyk nkok dk;n;kus pkyw 'kd.kkj ukgh-Þ

4. Mr. Gaikwad, learned counsel appearing for the

Applicants states that the Applicants have no objection for

allotting the above share to the Respondents. Mr. Gaikwad

further states that in fact, the said property is in possession of

the Respondents.

5. Therefore, subject to above, till the disposal of the Second

Appeal, the Judgment and Decree passed by the learned First

Appellate Court shall remain stayed.

6. The Civil Application is disposed of in above terms with no

order as to costs.

        Digitally
        signed by
        SONALI                                                     [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
 SONALI MILIND
 MILIND PATIL
 PATIL Date:

        2023.01.03
        16:59:11
        +0530