Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Wesley International Ltd vs Rakesh Malhotra
2023 Latest Caselaw 687 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 687 Bom
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2023

Bombay High Court
Wesley International Ltd vs Rakesh Malhotra on 19 January, 2023
Bench: R. I. Chagla
             Digitally signed
JITENDRA by JITENDRA
         SHANKAR
SHANKAR NIJASURE
NIJASURE 15:10:22
         Date: 2023.01.21
                  +0530




                                                                          22-ial-30167-2022.doc

jsn
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                           IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

                        INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.30167 OF 2022
                                          IN
                  COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO.30021 OF 2022

            Wesley International Ltd.                                   ...Applicant /
                                                                        Decree Holder

                                Versus

            Mr. Rakesh Malhotra                                         ...Respondent /
                                                                        Judg. Debtor

                                                     ----------
            Mr. Ashish Kamat with Mr. Akshay Doctor and Ms. Henna Daulat i/b.
            M/s. Desai and Diwanji for the Applicant.
            Siddhesh Bhole with Yakshay Chheda i/b. SSB Legal and Advisory for
            the Respondent.
                                                     ----------

                                                     CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA J

                                                      DATE        : 19 January 2023

            ORDER :

1. Mr. Ashish Kamat learned Counsel for the Applicant

seeks leave to file Affidavit of Service in the Registry. He has

submitted that service had been attempted on the Respondent /

Judgment Debtor who has refused service and thus deemed to be

good service. The Affidavit of Service shall be filed in the Registry by

22-ial-30167-2022.doc

24th January, 2023.

2. This Interim Application has been taken out in the

Commercial Execution Application. Various relief have been sought

for including deposit of a sum of INR 53,98,92,832.01 by the

Respondent / Judgment Debtor in this Court which is payable under

the judgment and decree of the Department of Justice Dubai - Courts

dated 26th September, 2004.

3. Mr. Ashish Kamat has referred to the judgment passed by

the Department of Justice Dubai - Courts dated 26th September,

2004 as well as the Certificate issued by Dubai Courts on 17th

February, 2021 wherein the Dubai - Courts has certified that the

Execution was filed by the Execution Applicant / Wesley

International Ltd on 15th January, 2019 against the Judgment Debtor

seeking for the Judgment Debtor to be ordered to pay an amount of

AED 26287092 under the said Judgment. However, to date no

amounts have been obtained in the execution file. It is a matter of

record that the judgment passed by the Department of Justice Dubai -

Courts had been appealed from which Appeal was dismissed. The

present Execution Application is taken out in view of the certificate

22-ial-30167-2022.doc

issued by the Dubai - Courts that no amounts have been obtained in

the execution file.

4. Mr. Ashish Kamat has submitted that the Respondent /

Judgment Debtor is having assets within the jurisdiction of this Court

and that in view of the said judgment passed by the Dubai - Courts of

which execution has been sought, disclosure of his assets are required

to be made by the Respondent / Judgment Debtor and pending such

disclosure, the Respondent / Judgment Debtor be restrained from

alienating his assets.

5. Mr. Ashish Kamat has referred to different proceedings in

which the Respondent / Judgment Debtor was a party and where this

Court had come down heavily on the Respondent / Judgment Debtor.

He has submitted that the Respondent / Judgment Debtor is a

habitual offendor and accordingly necessary orders be passed in

execution restraining the Respondent / Judgment Debtor from

alienating his assets.

6. Mr. Bhole, the learned Counsel for the Respondent /

Judgment Debtor has opposed any relief being granted. He has

22-ial-30167-2022.doc

submitted that the present Interim Application has not been served

on the Respondent / Judgment Debtor and he has sought time to file

Affidavit in Reply to the Interim Application. He has raised an

objection on the ground of jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the

Execution Application, given that the judgment was passed by the

Dubai - Courts on 26th September, 2004 and therefore the period of

12 years for filing execution against a decree has expired. He has

sought to rely upon relevant provisions of Code of Civil Procedure,

1908 on this ground.

7. I have noted that the Respondent / Judgment Debtor

seeks time to file Affidavit in Reply. However, at the same time it

must be noted that there is a judgment passed by the Dubai - Courts,

wherein there is monetary decree passed against the Respondent /

Judgment Debtor and certificate issued by the Dubai - Courts on 17 th

February, 2021 certifying that to date no amounts have been obtained

in the execution file. This has resulted in the present Execution

Application filed. The Dubai - Courts in passing the monetary decree

held that the Respondent / Judgment Debtor had made part payment

of the amounts owed to the Applicant / Judgment Debtor pursuant to

the Commercial transaction entered into between the parties and

22-ial-30167-2022.doc

there is a failure to make balance payment. There is a finding of

judicial admission made by the Respondent / Judgment Debtor with

regard to monies due to the Applicant / Judgment Debtor. In view

thereof, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the

Respondent / Judgment Debtor, including on the preliminary issue of

jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the present Execution

Application, the Respondent / Judgment Debtor is required to make

disclosure in sealed cover.

8. The Respondent / Judgment Debtor shall make

disclosure in terms of the prayer clause (b) of the Interim

Application, which read thus:-

(b) that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to order the Respondent, by himself, servants, agents, or any persons claiming through or under him, to disclose on oath along with supporting documents all his assets / properties, movable or immovable, tangible or intangible, including shares (in physical and DEMAT forms), bank accounts, jewellery, cash at hand, FDRs, insurance policies, trademarks, intellectual property, etc., and also his financial statements, Balance Sheets and Income Tax Returns with effect from the year 2015 onwards and till date".

9. The Respondent / Judgment Debtor shall file his

22-ial-30167-2022.doc

Affidavit in Reply to the Interim Application within a period of four

weeks from the date of this Order. Further, the disclosure shall be

made in terms of prayer clause (b) within a period of four weeks

from the date of this Order in sealed cover and filed in the Registry.

10. Place the Interim Application on 23rd February, 2023

under caption for ad-interim, high on board.

[R.I. CHAGLA J.]

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter