Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12551 Bom
Judgement Date : 11 December, 2023
Digitally signed
by SHAGUFTA
SHAGUFTA QUTBUDDIN
PATHAN
QUTBUDDIN
Date:
PATHAN 2023.12.13 7-IA-153-2019.doc
15:30:53
+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 153 OF 2019
(For Bail)
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1234 OF 2019
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1234 OF 2019
Arun Laxman Koli ...Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure a/w Ms. Stely J. Dias for the
Applicant/Appellant
Mr. S. V. Gavand, Addl.P.P for the Respondent No.1-State
Mr. Vinay J. Bhanushali, Appointed Advocate for the Respondent
No. 2
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
GAURI GODSE, JJ.
MONDAY, 11th DECEMBER 2023 P.C :
1 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2 By this application, the applicant seeks suspension of his
sentence and enlargement on bail, pending the hearing and final
disposal of the appeal.
7-IA-153-2019.doc
3 The applicant, vide judgment and order dated 19th August
2019 passed by the learned Sessions Judge-2, Sangli, in Special Case
(POCSO) No. 10/2017, has been convicted and sentenced as under:
- for the offence punishable under Section 375 sixthly r/w
Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code r/w Section 5(1) r/w
Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences
Act, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of
Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for 1 month;
- for the offence punishable under Section 363 r/w 366 of
the Indian Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 5
years and to pay fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine,
to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 1 month.
All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
4 Perused the papers. The prosecutrix (PW 1) at the
relevant time, was aged 13 years and 5 months, whereas, the applicant
7-IA-153-2019.doc
was about 20 years of age. From a perusal of the evidence of the
prosecutrix, it appears that she was sexually assaulted on two
occasions whilst going to the school i.e. on 28th November 2016 and 1st
December 2016. The said evidence is duly corroborated by the
evidence of PW 3-Dr. Rohan Shirodkar. Although learned counsel for
the applicant alleges some discrepancy in the name of the mother of
the prosecutrix in her School Leaving Certificate, no question was put
to the prosecutrix in respect of the same, except to PW 5, the mother of
the prosecutrix.
5 Considering the evidence on record, this is not a fit case to
enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence, Interim Application No.
153/2019 is rejected and as such, the application stands disposed of.
6 Appeal be listed on the final hearing board in the week
commencing January 2024 at its appropriate place as per its turn.
GAURI GODSE, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!