Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sagar Sadanand Bhandari vs State Of Maharashtra
2023 Latest Caselaw 12400 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12400 Bom
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2023

Bombay High Court

Sagar Sadanand Bhandari vs State Of Maharashtra on 7 December, 2023

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere, Gauri Godse

2023:BHC-AS:36817-DB
                                                                  18-IA-2032-2023-APEAL-841-2023.doc




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 rrpillai
                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2032 OF 2023
                                                IN
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 841 OF 2023

               Sagar Sadanand Bhandari                             ...Applicant
                       Versus
               State of Maharashtra                                ...Respondent


               Mr. Sanjeev P. Kadam a/w. Ms. Varsha Thorat i/b. Mr. Bhanudas L.
               Jagtap for the Applicant.
               Mr. S. V. Gavand, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.


                                               CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
                                                          GAURI GODSE, JJ.
                                               DATE     : 7th DECEMBER 2023
               P. C. :


               1.        Heard learned counsel for the parties.


               2.        By this application, the applicant seeks suspension of his

               sentence and enlargement on bail pending the hearing and final

               disposal of his aforesaid appeal.


               3.        The applicant by judgment and order dated 20 th April 2022

               passed by the Learned Sessions Judge, Borivali, Div. Dindoshi,

                                                  1/5


                ::: Uploaded on - 08/12/2023                  ::: Downloaded on - 09/12/2023 07:21:07 :::
                                                 18-IA-2032-2023-APEAL-841-2023.doc




Mumbai in Sessions Case No. 195 of 2017 has been convicted

and sentenced alongwith other co-accused as under :


       -- for the offence punishable under section 302 read with

       Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, to suffer

       imprisonment for life and pay fine of Rs.50,000/-, in

       default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years;


       -- for the offence punishable under sections 143, 144 and

       148 of the Indian Penal Code, to suffer rigorous

       imprisonment for two years and pay fine of Rs.2,000/-, in

       default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months;


       -- for the offence punishable under section 506 (Part-II) of

       the Indian Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for

       three years and pay fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default to undergo

       rigorous imprisonment for two months;

       All the aforesaid sentences are been directed to run

       concurrently.


4.     There is direct evidence relied upon by the prosecution i.e.

two eye witnesses are PW-2 - Nasruddin Shamshuddin Khan and

                                2/5


 ::: Uploaded on - 08/12/2023                ::: Downloaded on - 09/12/2023 07:21:07 :::
                                                18-IA-2032-2023-APEAL-841-2023.doc




PW-3- Sandip Jayantor Das. As far as PW-2-Nasruddin

Shamshuddin Khan is concerned, he has in his evidence stated

that the applicant pushed the deceased and thereafter assaulted

him with fist blows. As far as PW-3- Sandip Jayantor Das is

concerned, he too has alleged that the applicant pushed the

deceased and assaulted him with fist blows and thereafter with an

iron rod.

5.     It appears from the prosecution case that the information

with respect to the assault on the deceased was informed by the

applicant to the Control Room by calling 100. The mobile

number from which the call was made by the applicant is also

recorded in his arrest form.     As far as motive is concerned,

admittedly, the applicant had no motive to assault the deceased in

as much as the dispute was essentially between the deceased and

the accused no. 1 with respect to an incident which had taken

place seven years prior.


6.     As far as recovery of clothes is concerned, although clothes

are recovered at the instance of the applicant, no blood stains



                                3/5


 ::: Uploaded on - 08/12/2023               ::: Downloaded on - 09/12/2023 07:21:07 :::
                                                 18-IA-2032-2023-APEAL-841-2023.doc




were found on the same. It also appears that initially when the

police reached the spot, the police apprehended original accused

no. 1, present applicant and the deceased and took them to

Siddharth Hospital where the deceased was treated, from there

the deceased was brought to the police station and when he

vomitted he was again taken to Cooper hospital where he

scummbed to his injuries on the next date. The cause of death is

stated to be head injury.


7.      The applicant is in custody for about 6 ½ years. The appeal

is of the year 2023 and is not likely to be heard in the near future.

Considering the evidence on record qua the applicant, as stated

aforesaid, the application is allowed and the applicant's sentence

is suspended and he is enlarged on bail on the following terms

and conditions:

                                 ORDER

i) The Applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing

P.R.Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each with one or two

sureties in the like amount;

18-IA-2032-2023-APEAL-841-2023.doc

ii) The Applicant shall report to the trial Court, once in

four months on the day/date specified by the trial Court, till

the appeal is finally disposed of;

iii) The Applicant shall keep the trial Court informed of

their current address and mobile contact number and/or

change of residence or mobile details, if any, from time to

time;

iv) If there are two consecutive defaults in appearing before

the trial Court, the learned Judge shall make a report to the

High Court and the prosecution would be at liberty to file

an application seeking cancellation of bail.

11. The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is

accordingly disposed.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

GAURI GODSE, J.                           REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.






 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter