Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ku. Gauri D/O Vinay Palliwar Minor ... vs The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Its ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 8173 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8173 Bom
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2023

Bombay High Court
Ku. Gauri D/O Vinay Palliwar Minor ... vs The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Its ... on 9 August, 2023
Bench: A.S. Chandurkar, Vrushali V. Joshi
                                  1/4                      961.wp.3871.23-J.odt


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

                            WRIT PETITION NO. 3871/2023


      Ku. Gauri D/o. Vinay Palliwar,
      Aged About 17 Years, Occ. : Student (Minor)
      Through her Legal Guardian/Mother
      Rajlaxmi Vinay Palliwar,
      Aged about 46 years, Occ. Housewife,
      R/o. Shastri Chowk, Podar Bagicha,
      Near Andhra Bank, Wardha,
      Ta. & Dist. Wardha.                         ----PETITIONER

                --VERSUS--
1.    The State of Maharashtra,
      Through its Secretary,
      Tribal Development Department,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.

2.    The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny
      Committee, Nagpur Division, Giripeth,
      Nagpur.                                            ----RESPONDENTS

Mr. A. I. Sheikh, Advocate for Petitioner.
Ms. S. S. Jachak, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondents/State.

       CORAM : A.S.CHANDURKAR AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : AUGUST 09, 2023

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : A.S.CHANDURKAR, J.)

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard the learned

Counsel for the parties.

2. The challenge raised is to the order passed by the Scrutiny

Committee on 20.07.2020 invalidating the petitioner's claim of belonging

2/4 961.wp.3871.23-J.odt

to 'Mannewar' Schedulede Tribe. To substantiate the claim as made, the

petitioner relied upon various pre-constitutional documents of her

forefathers including the School Leaving Certificate of the brother of the

petitioner's grandfather Kishore. In that document, the date of birth has

been shown as 31.07.1944, the date of admission is shown as 11.05.1956

and the date of leaving the school is shown as 30.04.1966. The same has

the entry 'Mannewar'. In view of the fact that some other documents of

the year 1930, 1941 and 1944 had the entry Telgu/Telangi, the Scrutiny

Committee has invalidated the petitioner's claim.

3. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and with

their assistance we have also perused the documents on record along with

the report of the Vigilance Cell. The report of the Vigilance Cell indicates

that in the School Leaving Certificate of the brother of the petitioner's

grandfather, the entry 'Mannewar' figures. It has then observed that in

subsequent documents the word Telgu/Telangi has been found. On this

basis, the Scrutiny Committee has proceeded to invalid the claim. The

effect of the entries Telgu/Telangi has been considered by this Court in

various proceedings and especially in the decisions in Writ Petition

No.5090/2003 (Shri Anil Ramdas Mede Vs. The State of Maharashtra and

Ors.) decided on 26.08.2004, in Writ Petition No.1311/2012 (Nitin s/o.

Ramesh Uprellu Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr.) decided on

3/4 961.wp.3871.23-J.odt

30.11.2012 and in Writ Petition No. 5119/2016 (Manish son of Bansidhar

Panchgam Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) decided on 10.04.2017. It

has been held that there is no caste as Telgu/Telangi and the said words

refer to the region that was part of the erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh.

We thus find that the claim of the petitioner has been invalidated only on

the ground that there were entries of Telgu/Telangi. The reasoning of the

Scrutiny Committee is against the decisions referred to.

4. Since the Scrutiny Committee misdirected itself while

invalidating the petitioner's claim, its order is unsustainable. The same is

liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the following order is passed :

i] The order passed by the Scrutiny Committee dated

20.07.2020 is quashed and set aside.

ii] It is declared that the petitioner has proved that she

belongs to 'Mannewar' Scheduled Tribe. The Scrutiny

Committee shall within a period of three weeks from

today issue Validity Certificate in favour of the

petitioner.

iii] Till the petitioner receives the Validity Certificate, she is

free to rely upon the copy of this judgment to indicate

4/4 961.wp.3871.23-J.odt

that her claim of belonging to 'Mannewar' Scheduled

Tribe has been accepted.

5. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No order as to

costs.

(MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (A.S.CHANDURKAR, J.)

RGurnule .

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter