Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Asha W/O Padamakar Surkar vs State Of Mha. Thr. Pso Ps ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 3949 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3949 Bom
Judgement Date : 20 April, 2023

Bombay High Court
Asha W/O Padamakar Surkar vs State Of Mha. Thr. Pso Ps ... on 20 April, 2023
Bench: Vinay Joshi, Bharat Pandurang Deshpande
                                   18.apl339.1248.2022.jud.odt




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

           CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 339 OF 2021

   Rajkumar s/o Sureshrao Maske,
   Aged about : 36 years, Occu. Naik Police
   Constable, M.I.D.C. Police Station, Nagpur,                            ... Applicant
   R/o: Radke Layout, Balaji High School,
   Hingana Road, Nagpur.

                             Versus
1. State of Maharashtra,
   Through Police Station Officer,
   Police Station Hudkeshwar,
   District : Nagpur.
                                                                       ...Non-applicants
2. Smt. Asha w/o Padmakar Surkar
   Aged : 50, Occupation : Housewife,
   R/o. Plot No.522, Old Basti, Manewada,
   Besa Road, Nagpur.


                            WITH
          CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 1248 OF 2022

   Smt. Asha w/o Padamakar Surkar
   Aged about 51 years,
   Occupation - Housewife,                                                ... Applicant
   R/o. Plot No.522, Manewada Old Basti,
   Besa Road, Nagpur.

                             Versus
1. State of Maharashtra,
   Through its Police Station Officer,
   Police Station Hudkeshwar, Nagpur,
   District : Nagpur.
                                                                       ...Non-applicants
2. Rajkumar s/o Sureshrao Maske,
   Aged about : 37 years, Occupation - Naik Police
   Constable, M.I.D.C. Police Station, Nagpur,
   R/o: Radke Layout, Balaji High School,
   Hingna Road, Nagpur.




                                                                                        PAGE 1 OF 4



    ::: Uploaded on - 24/04/2023                                 ::: Downloaded on - 24/04/2023 23:09:16 :::
                                      18.apl339.1248.2022.jud.odt




Ms. U.P. Dable, Advocate for applicant in APL No.339/2021 and for
non-applicant No.2 in APL No.1248/2022.
Mr. V.A. Thakare, APP for non-applicant/State.
Mr. B.C. Chandrakapure, Advocate for non-applicant No.2 in APL
No.339/2021 and for applicant in APL No.1248/2022.

                                       CORAM               : VINAY JOSHI, AND
                                                             BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, JJ.
                                       DATED               : 20.04.2023.


ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER: Vinay Joshi, J.)


.                       Admit. Heard finally by the consent of the learned

counsel for the respective parties.



(2)                      Criminal Application (APL) No.339/2021, is filed by

one Rajkumar Maske, seeking to quash FIR in Crime No.82/2021,

registered with Police Station Hudkeshwar, Nagpur, for the offences

punishable under Sections 325, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code,

on account of settlement. Whilst Criminal Application (APL)

No.1248/2022, is filed by one Asha Surkar, seeking to quash FIR in

Crime No.83/2021, registered with Police Station Hudkeshwar,

Nagpur, for the offences punishable under Sections 325, 504 and 506

of the Indian Penal Code along with related Charge-sheet No.31/2021,

on account of settlement.

PAGE 2 OF 4

18.apl339.1248.2022.jud.odt

(3) The first Crime No.82/2021, is registered against

Rajkumar, at the instance of Asha Surkar, whilst another Crime

No.83/2021, was registered against Asha Surkar, at the instance of

Rajkumar Maske. Precisely, these are the cross cases against each

other. The allegations in first crime were pertaining to causing

grievous hurt by means of fist blows whilst in another crime, the

allegations are about abuses in filthy language coupled with hurt and

threat.

(4) The parties are resident of same area. With the

intervention of respectable members of the society, they have settled

the internal differences. Both have settled the matter and filed joint

compromise pursis stating about settlement and their no objection to

quash respective FIR. Both are present before us and identified by

their learned Advocates. Both have accepted about settlement and no

objection to quash the FIR.

(5) It reveals that out of some transaction, the

differences arose between the parties. The alleged offences are

basically about causing hurt which cannot be termed as heinous or

PAGE 3 OF 4

18.apl339.1248.2022.jud.odt

serious one. Moreover, to maintain cordial relations, they have settled

the dispute. In the circumstances, the interest of justice would be sub-

served by disposing both cases on account of settlement. Having

regards to above fact, we deem it appropriate to invoke our inherent

jurisdiction.

(6) Both applications are allowed and disposed

accordingly. We hereby quash and set aside the FIR in Crime

No.82/2021, registered with Police Station Hudkeshwar, Nagpur, for

the offences punishable under Sections 325, 504 and 506 of the Indian

Penal Code. We also quash and set aside the FIR in Crime

No.83/2021, for the offences punishable under Sections 325, 504 and

506 of the Indian Penal Code along with related Charge-sheet

No.31/2021.

[BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.] [VINAY JOSHI, J.]

Prity

PAGE 4 OF 4

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter