Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9974 Bom
Judgement Date : 29 September, 2022
903-WP-6188-2019.doc
SATISH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
RAMCHANDRA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SANGAR
Digitally signed by
SATISH RAMCHANDRA
SANGAR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 6188 OF 2019
Date: 2022.10.01
17:45:39 +0530
1. Mr. Mihir Harshad Vyas
2. Mrs. Nayna Harshad Vyas
3. Mr. Nakul Harshad Vyas ...Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Maharashtra
2. Mrs. Nisha Mihir Vyas ...Respondents
Ms.Urvi Shah i/b. M/s. I.R. Joshi and Co., Advocate for the
Petitioners.
Mrs.A.S.Pai, PP a/w Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP for the Respondent
No.1-State.
Mr.Arun Atwal a/w Mr.Jigar Agarwal, Ms.Suman Maurya and
Mr.Baba Singh, Advocates for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
S. M. MODAK, JJ.
DATE : 29th SEPTEMBER 2022
P.C. :
1 Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2 Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith, with the
Satish Sangar 1/6
903-WP-6188-2019.doc
consent of the parties and is taken up for final disposal.
Learned APP waives notice on behalf of the respondent
no.1-State and Ms.Shah waives notice on behalf of the
respondent no.2.
3 By this petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the
FIR/complaint, registered vide C.R. No. 0144 of 2016 with
the Mira Road Police Station, Mumbai for the alleged
offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 504,
506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Quashing is
sought on the premise, that the parties have amicably
settled their dispute.
4 Perused the papers. The petitioner no.1 is the husband
of the respondent no.2 and the petitioner no.2 is the mother
in-law and petitioner no.3 is the brother in-law of the
respondent no.2 respectively. It appears that the petitioner
no.1. Respondent No.2 got married on 1 st June, 2010 at Mira
Road, Thane as per the Hindu rites and rituals. Post
marriage, there was some marital discord between the
Satish Sangar 2/6 903-WP-6188-2019.doc
parties, pursuant to which the respondent no.2 lodged the
aforesaid C.R. with Mira Road Police Station alleging the
aforesaid offences. After investigation, charge-sheet was
filed as against the petitioner and the case is presently
pending before the learned JMFC, 9 th Court at Thane being
R.C.C.No. 97 of 2017.
5 It appears that in the interregnum, the parties decided
to amicably resolve and settle their dispute. Accordingly, in
2016, a petition for dissolution of marriage under Section
13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act was filed by the parties
before the 7th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Thane.
Consent terms were filed on 21 st January, 2019 and decree
of divorce of mutual consent was passed on 28 th December,
2019. Learned Counsel has tendered a certified copy of the
said judgment and order dated 28th December, 2019,
dissolving the marriage between the petitioner no.1 and the
respondent no.2 , by decree of divorce by mutual consent. It
appears that the petitioner no.1 by a gift deed has been
Satish Sangar 3/6 903-WP-6188-2019.doc
given a flat at Mira Road and has been paid Rs.8,50,000/- by
way of one time settlement to the respondent no.2. It
appears that the said flat has been given to the respondent
no.2 to manage the education, maintenance and welfare of
their son for lifetime.
6 Today, the respondent no.2 is present in person. She
has tendered her consent affidavit dated 19 th August, 2022,
duly affirmed before the Assistant Registrar, High Court. The
said affidavit is taken on record. In the said affidavit, the
respondent no.2 has stated that she has amicably settled
the dispute and that, she has decided to withdraw all
allegations/complaints made by her against the petitioners,
including the subject FIR. She has stated that she has no
objection for quashing of the said C.R./proceedings. On
being questioned, the respondent no.2 reiterates what is
stated by her in the affidavit. She is identified by her
Counsel Mr.Arun Atwal. Learned Counsel for the respondent
no.2 has handed over a xerox copy of the aadhar card which
Satish Sangar 4/6 903-WP-6188-2019.doc
is in her maiden name Nisha Jaiswal, duly certified by her.
The same is taken on record.
7 Considering the nature of dispute, the relations
between the parties, the amicable settlement between
them and having regard to the judicial pronouncements of
the Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.1
and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. 2,
there is no impediment in allowing the petition.
8 The petition is accordingly allowed and the FIR bearing
C.R.No.0144 of 2016 registered with the Mira Road Police
Station, Mumbai is quashed and set aside. Consequently,
the proceedings which is pending before the Learned JMFC,
9th Court, Thane bearing R.C.C.No.97 of 2017 is also
quashed and set aside.
9 Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. Petition is
disposed of accordingly.
1 (2012) 10 SCC 303
2 (2014) 6 SCC 466
Satish Sangar 5/6
903-WP-6188-2019.doc
10 All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this
order.
S. M. MODAK, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. Satish Sangar 6/6
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!