Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Punam Bhuransingh Chavhan Alias ... vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 9875 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9875 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 September, 2022

Bombay High Court
Punam Bhuransingh Chavhan Alias ... vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. ... on 27 September, 2022
Bench: S.B. Shukre, G. A. Sanap
         926-wp 62-20-                                                                            1/4


                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

                              WRIT PETITION NO. 62 OF 2020

         PETITIONER :-                     Punam     Bhuransingh     Chavhan     @
                                           Smt.Punam Manohar Rathod, Aged about
                                           40 years, Occup. Service, R/o At Post,
                                           Jamb, Taluka Mohadi, District Bhandara.

                                              ...VERSUS...

         RESPONDENTS :-1.                   State of Maharashtra, through its
                                            Principal  Chief  Secretary, Rural
                                            Development Department, Mantralaya,
                                            Mumbai.

                                       2. Zilla Parishad, Nagpur, Through its Chief
                                          Executive Officer, Nagpur.

         --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       Mr.Akshay Sudame, counsel for the petitioner.
                      Mr.K.L.Dharmadhikari,AGP for respondent No.1
                       Mr.Shaikh Majid, counsel for respondent No.2.
         ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             CORAM : SUNIL B.SHUKRE &
                                                            G.A. SANAP, JJ.
                                            DATE         : 27.09.2022.
         ORAL          J U D G M E N T (Per :Sunil B.Shukre, J.)



         (1)              Heard.




Kavita
          926-wp 62-20-                                                       2/4


         (2)             Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by

consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

(3) It appears that one post of Pharmacist reserved for VJ-

A category is going to fall vacant on retirement of one candidate

Mr. M.R.Pawar, on superannuation with effect from 01.02.2023. If

this is so, the request of the petitioner seeking her transfer from

Bhandara Zilla Parishad to Nagpur Zilla Parishad can be

appropriately considered by Zilla Parishad Nagpur, provided

proposal in that regard is sent by Zilla Parishad Bhandara, one

month before creation of the vacancy in the said category of VJ-A.

(4) The learned counsel for Zilla Parishad Bhandara,

submits that if fresh application is submitted by the petitioner,

stating new grounds, the same shall be processed appropriately

and then appropriate decision thereon, shall be taken by Zilla

Parishad, Bhandara. We must say it here that there is already a

policy of the State Government which encourages the unification

of the husband and wife working at different places on different

posts of government establishments or local authorities. Therefore,

Kavita 926-wp 62-20- 3/4

when a person like the petitioner, who is otherwise eligible for

availment of the benefit of the husband and wife unification policy

of the State, there is ordinarily no reason for her parent

establishment to refuse to forward her inter-district transfer

application. In fact, this Court had already directed Zilla Parishad

Nagpur, by its judgment dated 20/09/2019 to take necessary steps

in accordance with rules for accepting the inter-district transfer of

the petitioner from Zilla Parishad Bhandara to Zilla Parishad

Nagpur. Therefore, it would be in the interest of justice that

appropriate directions are issued to Zilla Parishad Bhandara and

Zilla Parishad Nagpur in the matter, while disposing of this

petition.

(5) Accordingly, we direct that, the petitioner shall be at

liberty to file a fresh application on the new ground of creation of

vacancy in February-2023 in VJ-A category of Pharmacist to Zilla

Parishad Nagpur and we direct that if such an application is made

by the petitioner, same shall be processed appropriately and

forwarded to Zilla Parishad, Nagpur, for appropriate decision,

within 15 days from receipt of the application by Zilla Parishad,

Kavita 926-wp 62-20- 4/4

Bhandara. We further direct Zilla Parishad Nagpur to take

appropriate decision in the matter consistent with the husband

wife unification policy of the State, within a period of one month

from the date of the receipt of the application for inter-district

transfer within one month from 1 st February 2023, whichever is

later.

(6) In view of the above judgment, pending application/s ,

if any, is/ are disposed of.

(7) In view of judgment passed in Writ Petition No. 62 of

2020, review application No.310 of 2020 stands disposed of.

(8) Rule is made absolute in the above terms. No costs.

                                          (G.A.SANAP ,J)               (SUNIL B. SHUKRE,J)




    Kavita
Signed By:KAVITA PRAVIN
TAYADE
P. A.

Signing Date:28.09.2022 19:56
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter