Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

State Of Maha vs Dagdu Appa Bandgar
2022 Latest Caselaw 10732 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10732 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 October, 2022

Bombay High Court
State Of Maha vs Dagdu Appa Bandgar on 14 October, 2022
Bench: S. G. Dige
                                       (1)                                 1031-fa-1842-2008




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                       FIRST APPEAL NO.1842 OF 2008

                STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                        VERSUS
                 DAGDU APPA BANDGAR
                         ...
 Mr. S. S. Dande, Advocate for the Appellant.
                                             ...

                                  CORAM : S. G. DIGE, J.

                                   DATED : 14th OCTOBER, 2022.

 PER COURT:-

 1.               Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the
 judgment           and        Award    passed        by      the      Civil          Judge,
 Senior          Division,             Latur      (for         short         'Reference
 Court')            this         appeal          is        preferred             by        the
 appellant/orig. Respondent.


 2.               It      is     the         contention          of      the       learned
 counsel for the appellant that, the Special Land
 Acquisition Officer has awarded the compensation of
 Rs.5000/- per acre, whereas learned Reference Court
 has enhanced it to Rs.25,000/- per acre, which is
 excessive.             The learned Reference Court has wrongly
 relied         upon      sale     instance           at    Exhibit-17             without
 considering the quality and fertility of the land.
 The      said       sale       instance         was       not      from       the       same
 village.           Inspite of that, it was considered by the
 learned Reference Court.                        Hence, requested to allow
 the appeal.



::: Uploaded on - 17/10/2022                               ::: Downloaded on - 18/10/2022 07:06:32 :::
                                            (2)                              1031-fa-1842-2008




 3.                Though sole respondent private party was
 served, none appears for sole respondent.


 4.                I     have        heard          learned       A.G.P.          for       the
 appellant.              Perused the judgment and order passed
 by the learned Reference Court.

 5.                The         learned           Reference       Court        by      common
 judgment           has        decided            three    LARs       including             LAR
 challenged              in      present            appeal.            The       land           of
 respondent was situated at Survey No.5/3 at village
 Lohata.           It was acquired for Lower Terna project by
 appellant.                 The Special Land Acquisition Officer
 has       awarded             Rs.5000/-            per     acre        compensation,
 whereas the learned Reference Court has enhanced it
 to     Rs.25,000/-              per        acre.          While       enhancing            the
 compensation                  the     learned            Reference          Court          has
 considered the sale instance which is at Exhibit-
 17.       The learned Reference Court has observed that,
 the price of the sale under the sale instance was
 of Rs.26,500/- per acre on 03.10.1988 and on that
 basis he has determined the price of the land on
 01.02.1990 i.e. date of Notification.                                      The learned
 Reference             Court         has         further    observed          that,         the
 price of the land increase year by year and on that
 basis he has considered the price of Rs.25,000/-
 per acre considering the land of the respondent as
 dry land.               It appears from the record that, the
 land sold and the acquired land of the respondent
 are not at far distance.                                In view of the above,
 there        is       no      infirmity            in    the    order        passed            by

::: Uploaded on - 17/10/2022                                ::: Downloaded on - 18/10/2022 07:06:32 :::
                                (3)                           1031-fa-1842-2008



 the learned Reference Court.                I pass the following
 order:
                                     ORDER

A. Appeal is dismissed.

B. No order as to costs.

(S. G. DIGE) JUDGE

Devendra/October-2022

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter