Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kranti Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana ... vs Mr. Prakash Dhareoppa Kumbhar
2022 Latest Caselaw 10397 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10397 Bom
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2022

Bombay High Court
Kranti Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana ... vs Mr. Prakash Dhareoppa Kumbhar on 10 October, 2022
Bench: Anuja Prabhudessai
                                                                                    8 fa 1082-17.doc


                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            FIRST APPEAL NO. 1082 OF 2017


                        Kranti Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.             ..Appellant/Applicant.

                                     v/s.

                        Mr. Prakash Dhareoppa Kumbhar                          ..Respondents


                        Ms. Aparna M. Kalathil for the Appellant/Applicant.
                        Ms. Reeta R. Pawar for the Respondent.

                                                  CORAM : ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATED : 10th OCTOBER, 2022.

P.C.

1. The Appellant herein has challenged the judgment and order dated

1st December, 2015 passed by the Commissioner for Employees

Compensation, 4th Labour Court, Thane in APPL. (WCA) No.339 C-84/

2009. During pendency of the appeal, parties have arrived at amicable

settlement. Ms. Kalathil, learned Counsel for the Appellant and Ms.

Pawar, learned Counsel for the Respondent have placed on record

consent terms which read thus:

"1. The Respondent accept the amount of Rs.6,00,000/- paid

by the Appellant to Respondent by Demand Draft No.942740

drawn on State Bank of India, Palus Branch dated 19th July,

2022 towards full and final settlement of compensation Digitally signed by PRASANNA P PRASANNA P SALGAONKAR awarded by the Commissioner for Employees Compensation, SALGAONKAR Date:

2022.10.14 16:26:58 +0530

P P SALGAONKAR 1 of 3 8 fa 1082-17.doc

4th Labour Court, Thane in Case No.APPL (WCA) No. 339/

C-84/2009 by an order dated 1st December, 2015.

2. On receipt of the said amount by Demand Draft

No.942740 drawn on State Bank of India, Palus Branch

dated 19th July, 1922, the award passed by Commissioner for

Employees Compensation, 4th Labour Court, Thane in Case

No. APPL (WCA) No.339/C-84/2009 to be marked as

'Satisfaction'.

3. That the Appellant agrees not to ask for reimbursement

of amount of Rs.3,27,000/- paid by the Appellant to Ruby

Hospital, Pune towardes medical treatment of the

Respondent.

4. Liberty to the Appellant to withdraw amount deposited

in the Trial Court pursuant to the Interim Order of this

Honurable Court dated 1st August, 2017 of Rs.11,68,656/-

together with interest accrued thereon. The Commissioner

for Employees Compensation, Thane is hereby directed to

permit the Appellant to withdraw the entire amount together

with interest unconditionally."

2. The consent terms are signed by Mr. Virendra Deshmukh, H.R.

Manager of the Appellant Karkhana and by Dhareoppa Kumbhar, father

of the Respondent. The resolution authorizing Mr. Virendra Deshmukh

P P SALGAONKAR 2 of 3 8 fa 1082-17.doc

to enter into settlement and sign the terms as well as the Power of

Attorney executed by the Appellant to enter into settlement on his behalf

and sign the terms has been placed on record. The Attorney of the

Claimant has also filed his affidavit stating that he has agreed to settle

the matter for sum of Rs.6000/- towards full and final settlement and that

he has received a Demand Draft in respect of the said amount.

3. The signatories to the consent terms viz. Deshmukh and

Kumbhar, are present before the Court. Since the Attorney of the

Respondent does not understand English or Marathi, the terms were

explained to him through Advocate C.M.Lokesh who can read and write

Kannada language. The Attorney of the Respondent admits having

signed the consent terms and also confirms the contents of the consent

terms. The Consent Terms along with annexures are taken on record

and marked "X" for identification.

4. The statement made in the consent terms is admitted as an

undertaking to the Court. The POA of the Respondent has received the

Demand Draft for Rs.6 Lakhs.

5. In view of the consent terms filed by the parties, the appeal stands

disposed of.

6. Civil Application, if any, stands disposed of.



                                                        (ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)




P P SALGAONKAR                                                                            3 of 3
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter