Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12285 Bom
Judgement Date : 28 November, 2022
(29)-AO-1005-22.doc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1005 OF 2022
WITH
Digitally
BALAJI
signed by
BALAJI
GOVINDRAO
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.19277 OF 2022
GOVINDRAO PANCHAL
PANCHAL Date:
2022.11.29
16:52:19
+0530
The Gadhinglaj Urban Cooperative Bank ..Appellant
Versus
Sou. Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Surel S. Shah, for the Appellant.
Mr. Tejpal Ingale, for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
Mr. S. S. Redekar, for the Respondent No.6.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 28th NOVEMBER, 2022 P.C.
1. Counsel for the respondents/plaintiffs Mr. Tejpal Ingale submits that the suit preferred by the respondents/plaintiffs is maintainable considering the nature of challenge in the plaint which issue is resisted by counsel for the appellant by relying on the division bench judgment of this Court. According to him, in the case of Bank of Baroda Vs. Gopal Shriram Panda & Anr. reported in 2021 SCC Online Bom. 466, it has been held by this Court that in the given situation as reflected in the plaint, the suit is not maintainable as the remedy lies elsewhere.
2. At this stage, Mr. Tejpal Ingale seeks time to make his submissions in response to the above.
3. As such, stand over to 5th December, 2022. To be heard with Appeal from Order (Stamp) No.25561 of 2022.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
BGP. 1 of 1
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!