Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Edward Mauritius Ltd. And Anr vs Kakade Estate Developers Private ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 11307 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11307 Bom
Judgement Date : 9 November, 2022

Bombay High Court
Edward Mauritius Ltd. And Anr vs Kakade Estate Developers Private ... on 9 November, 2022
Bench: B.P. Colabawalla
                                                                        26-IA(L)-24451-2021.doc
GANESH
SUBHASH
LOKHANDE
Digitally signed by
GANESH SUBHASH
LOKHANDE
                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Date: 2022.11.10
17:25:09 +0530
                                        ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                              IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

                                        INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 24451 OF 2021
                                                              IN
                       COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO. 24448 OF 2021


                      Edward Mauritius Ltd. & Anr.                    .. Applicants/Award Holders
                                                                      / Judgment Creditors/
                                                                      Org. Respondent Nos. 6 & 7
                                Vs.
                      Kakade Estate Developers Private
                      Ltd & Ors                                       .. Judgment Debtors/
                                                                        Org. Respondent Nos. 1 to 5


                      Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd. & Anr.                 .. Org. Claimants



                      Aditya Shiralkar a/w. Nanki Grewal & Manasi Joglekar i/b. Wadia
                      Ghandy & Co. for the Applicants.
                      Purvi Doctor i/b. Elixir Legal Services for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5.


                                                           CORAM:- B. P. COLABAWALLA,J.

DATE :- 9th NOVEMBER, 2022.

P. C.:

1. Mentioned. With the consent of parties taken out of turn.

                      Ganesh Lokhande                                                    page 1 of 13
                                                   26-IA(L)-24451-2021.doc




2. It has been brought to my attention that certain Survey Nos.

have been missed out in paragraph 11 of the order dated 13 th October,

2022 which need to be inserted therein.

3. So that there is no confusion in the future, for the existing

paragraph 11, the following shall be substituted:

"11. In view of the forgoing discussion, the Court Receiver shall now proceed to sell the immovable property of Respondent No. 2 being Survey Nos. 109, 114, 115/1, 116, 115/7, 115/5, 110, 115/8, 115/12, 119/1, 125/4, 115/13, 203, 202, 8/4, 8/5, 7/1, 8/1, 8/2, 8/3, 8/6, 130/B/1, 113/2, 143, 115/3, 105/4, 105/1, 111, 105/2, 109, 123/1, 130/2B, 125/3, 107, 108, 115/2, 115/6, 115/11, 118/2, 122/2, 124, 109, 106/1B, 106/1C, 7/3, 7/4, 106/2A and 106/1A situated within the Registration Sub-District, Taluka- Mulshi, District Pune, Village - Bhugaon, Pune and situate within the limits of Town Planning for Concerned Authority. To take process of sale forward, the Court Receiver shall appoint a valuer from this panel to value the said property. Once the valuation is done, the Court Receiver shall file a report before this Court for fixing the reserve price. It is made clear that the reserve price shall not be disclosed to any party. Once the reserve price is fixed, the Court Receiver shall seek further directions for advertisement etc. to take the sale of the said property to its logical conclusion."

Ganesh Lokhande                                                    page 2 of 13
                                                   26-IA(L)-24451-2021.doc




4. No other correction is sought. The correction shall be

carried out in the original order as well as in the copy uploaded on the

server.

5. Place the above matter on 21st November, 2022.

6. This order will be digitally signed by the Personal Assistant

of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a

digitally signed copy of this order.

( B. P. COLABAWALLA, J. )

For the sake of convenience the corrected order reads thus:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 24451 OF 2021 IN COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO. 24448 OF 2021

Edward Mauritius Ltd. & Anr. .. Applicants/Award Holders / Judgment Creditors/

Vs.

Ganesh Lokhande                                                    page 3 of 13
                                                         26-IA(L)-24451-2021.doc


Kakade Estate Developers Private
Ltd & Ors                                              .. Judgment Debtors/



Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd. & Anr.                        .. Org. Claimants



Zal Andhyarujina, Sr. Counsel with Karan Bhide, Aditya Shiralkar a/w.

Nanki Grewal and Manasi Joglekar for the Applicants. Purvi Doctor a/w. Shweta Rathod i/b. Elixir Legal Services for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5.

Sameer A. Alekar, Asst. S. O. from the Office of Receiver is present.

CORAM:- B. P. COLABAWALLA,J.

DATE :- 13th OCTOBER, 2022.

P. C.:

1. The above Interim Application is filed seeking various

interim reliefs against Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 who are the Judgment

Debtors. Initially, the Applicants and Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 entered

into a Consent Terms dated 25 th November, 2020. The decretal amount

under the Consent Terms was Rs.121.77 Crores approximately. This

amount was to be paid in the manner set out in the Consent Terms. The

Consent Terms further provided that in the event of any

default on the part of Respondent Nos. 1 to 5, the entire amount of

Ganesh Lokhande page 4 of 13 26-IA(L)-24451-2021.doc

Rs.121,77,53,425/- would become payable. These Consent Terms were

taken on record by the Arbitral Tribunal on 19 th January, 2021 and a

Consent Award was passed.

2. Since, Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 [and whose liability was joint

and several] defaulted in making payment of the very first installment

under the Consent Terms, the Applicants issued a default notice to

Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. On the very same day, the said notice was

replied to [by email] and an extension was sought for making payment.

3. Be that as it may, since no payment was made, the above

Execution Application was filed seeking execution of the Consent Award

dated 19th January, 2021 read with the Consent Terms dated 25th

November, 2020. It is in this Execution Application, the above Interim

Application is filed seeking various interim reliefs.

4. Initially, on 28th October, 2021, this Court allowed the

above Interim Application in terms of prayer clause (a) which basically

relates to disclosures. This Court directed that the disclosure affidavit

shall be filed by each of the Respondents, namely, Respondent Nos. 1 to

5 by 22nd November, 2021. All supporting documents in original were

also to be offered for inspection on or before 22nd November, 2021.

Ganesh Lokhande                                                    page 5 of 13
                                                  26-IA(L)-24451-2021.doc


Thereafter, on 30th November, 2021, an extension of time was sought for

filing the disclosure affidavit which was granted by this Court. The

disclosure affidavits were thereafter filed on 7th December, 2021.

5. On 8th December, 2021, a detailed order was passed by this

Court in the above Interim Application. By the said order, the Court

Receiver, High Court, Bombay was appointed in respect of the land

situate at Bhugaon, Pune forming the subject matter of the

Development Agreement dated 21st April, 2008. In the said order, it was

made clear that the appointment of the Receiver will not in any manner

affect the ongoing negotiations for availing of credit facilities or other

investments that the proposed lenders/investors may have entered into

with Respondent Nos.1 to 5 and/or any of them. Liberty was granted to

the Respondents and the proposed lender/investor to apply to the Court

in the event the proposed lender/investor sanctioned any facilities to

Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 so that the decretal debt in the present

proceedings could be secured by the said lender/investor by depositing

in this Court the amount sufficient to meet the decretal debt. The reason

why this order was passed was because an argument was canvassed on

behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 that a proposal to restructure their

finances [by availing fresh credit facilities], was under negotiations. If

they were in a position to avail of fresh credit facilities, they would be

Ganesh Lokhande page 6 of 13 26-IA(L)-24451-2021.doc

able to pay the decretal debt without much difficulty, was the argument

canvassed by Respondent Nos. 1 to 5.

6. Be that as it may, as per the order dated 8 th December,

2021, the Court Receiver has taken possession of the Bhugaon property

on 20th December, 2021 and has also prepared a site report evidencing

this fact.

7. In this factual backdrop, Mr. Andhyarujina, the learned

senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants, submitted that

sufficient time has now been given to Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to

restructure their so called finances without any success and therefore

the Receiver should now be directed to sell the property of which he has

been appointed and the sale proceeds thereof be paid over to the

Applicants to the extent of their decretal debt. He also brought to my

attention that this order is now all the more necessary because from the

affidavits of disclosures filed, it is apparent that huge amounts are being

transacted inter-se between different companies of the Kakade Group

including Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. The chart showing these transactions

are as under:

Chart- Related Party and Unexplained Transactions:

Sr. No. Particulars                                  Reference in the

Ganesh Lokhande                                                  page 7 of 13
                                                    26-IA(L)-24451-2021.doc


                                                         Affidavits of
                                                         Disclosure ("AoD")
   1.        R2 i.e. Mr. Sanjay Kakade and R3 i.e.       Audited Balance Sheet
             Mrs. Usha Kakade have availed loans         of R5 for the year ended
             and advances from R5 i.e. Kakade            31st March, 2020 [Ref:
             Retailing Private Limited amounting to      Note 10 - Short Term
             approximately 86 Crore [Ref: Para No.       Loans and Advances. @
             13(a) @ page 108 of the Additional          page    180     of   the
             Affidavit dated 4th April 2022 of the       Disclosure Affidavit of
             Applicants ("Additional Affidavit")         R5]

   2.        R2 and R3 have availed loans and            Audited Balance Sheet
             advances from R4 i.e. Kharadi               of R4 for the year ended

Properties Private Limited amounting to 31st March, 2020. [Ref:

             approximately 9 crore. [Ref: Para No. 13    Note 8 - Short Term
             (b) @ page 108 of the Additional            Loans and Advances. @
             Affidavit.]                                 page 157, of the
                                                         Disclosure Affidavit of
                                                         R1.]

   3.        R5 i.e. Kakade Retailing Private Limited    Audited Balance Sheet
             was availed long term loans and             of R1 for the yeaer
             advances from R1 i.e. Kakade Estate         ended 31st March, 2020.
             Developers Private Limited amounting        [Ref: Note 7 - Long
             to approximately 85 Crore. [Ref: Para       Term      Loans     and
             13(c) @ page 109 of the Additional          Advances. @ page 122,
             Affidavit.]                                 of    the     Disclosure
                                                         Affidavit of R1.]

   4.        R2 has granted loans and advances to        Balance Sheet of R2 as
             various group companies and associate       on 31st March, 2020.
             concerns amounting to approximately 76      [Ref: Schedule 8 - Long
             crore. [Ref: Para No. 13(d) @ page 109 of   and      Loans      and
             the Additional Affidavit.]                  Advances (Assets). @
                                                         page 309, of the
                                                         Disclosure Affidavit of
                                                         R2.]

   5.        R3 has granted loans and advances to        Balance Sheet of R3 as
             various group companies and associate       on 31st March 2020.
             concerns amounting to approximately 34      [Ref: Schedule 7 -

crore. [Ref: Para 13(e) @ page 109 of the Loans and Advances Additional Affidavit.] (Assets), @ page 214, of

Ganesh Lokhande page 8 of 13 26-IA(L)-24451-2021.doc

the Disclosure Affidavit of R3]

8. Mr. Andhyarujina submitted that all this has been

categorically stated by the Applicants in their Additional Affidavit dated

4th April, 2022 and which was served on Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 on 5 th

April, 2022. Mr. Andhyarujina also pointed out that to defeat the

execution, Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 have gone to the extent of filing a

completely false Public Interest Litigation in this Court being PIL No. 12

of 2022. He submitted that though the Petitioner in the said PIL is some

third party, from the observations made by the PIL Court in its order

dated 10th October 2022, it is quite clear that it is the Kakades who are

really behind the said PIL to somehow stall and/or defeat and/or

obstruct the execution in the present proceedings as well as other

execution proceedings pending against them. He, therefore, submitted

that looking at the conduct of the Kakades, it is now time that the Court

Receiver be directed to sell the property of which he has been appointed.

He submitted that even if there is any dispute on the aspect of

distribution of the sale proceeds, that is something the Court can always

look into at a future date. However, this should not stop the Court

Receiver from proceeding to sell the said property.

Ganesh Lokhande                                               page 9 of 13
                                                  26-IA(L)-24451-2021.doc


9. On the other hand, the learned advocate appearing on

behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 5, requested that connected matters are

coming up on 9th November, 2022 and therefore this matter also be kept

on the said date. She brought to my attention the affidavits filed in

Court today [dated 12th October, 2022] and submitted that with a view

to resolve the present disputes, Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 are attempting to

raise finance so that the decretal dues of the Applicants can be paid. She

submitted that Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 are in the midst of completing

the formalities of raising finances and on disbursement of the

loan/credit facilities, Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 shall endeavor to

make payment towards the Applicants' claims. She submitted that the

Respondents are making a genuine attempt to clear their dues but the

process of raising finances, given the due diligence required and the

ongoing discussions, has not yet materialised and would take another

period of six months. She, therefore submitted that looking to these

facts, and considering that the Receiver is already appointed, no further

order be passed directing the Receiver to sell the said property.

10. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length

and have perused the papers and proceedings in the above Interim

Application. It is not in dispute that an amount of Rs.121.77 Crores

together with interest is due and payable by Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to

Ganesh Lokhande page 10 of 13 26-IA(L)-24451-2021.doc

the Applicants. They were supposed to pay this amount in installments

as set out in the Consent Terms dated 25 th November, 2020. Admittedly,

not a single installment has been paid by Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. It is

for this reason that the present Execution Application is filed. The

Consent Award passed on the basis of the Consent Terms has also

attained finality. In these circumstances, I fail to understand how

Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 can oppose sale of the property of which the

Receiver is appointed. It cannot be that after obtaining a decree in their

favour, the Applicants have to wait for years on end to realise the fruits

of their decree. In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rahul

S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi [(2021) 6 SCC 418] , after noticing

the urgent need to reduce delays in execution proceedings have in fact

passed several directions as more particularly set out in paragraph 42 of

the said judgment. Those directions are to be followed by all Courts, is

the mandate of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In the present case, there is

no defence raised. All that is sought once again, is an adjournment. I

must note that this very same argument was canvassed before this Court

[A. K. Menon, J] when he passed his order dated 8 th December, 2021. It

is because of this very argument that Justice Menon, at that time, and to

give an opportunity to Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to raise the finances to

pay off the decretal dues of the Applicants, did not direct the Court

Receiver to sell the property of which he is appointed. Today, again after

Ganesh Lokhande page 11 of 13 26-IA(L)-24451-2021.doc

a period of 10 months, the exact same mantra is reiterated before me

and a further accommodation for period of 6 months is requested. I am

afraid this Court has shown enough indulgence to Respondent Nos. 1 to

5 and cannot keep adjourning the above matter and make the

Applicants wait to enjoy the fruits of their decree.

11. In view of the forgoing discussion, the Court Receiver shall

now proceed to sell the immovable property of Respondent No. 2 being

Survey Nos. 109, 114, 115/1, 116, 115/7, 115/5, 110, 115/8, 115/12, 119/1,

125/4, 115/13, 203, 202, 8/4, 8/5, 7/1, 8/1, 8/2, 8/3, 8/6, 130/B/1,

113/2, 143, 115/3, 105/4, 105/1, 111, 105/2, 109, 123/1, 130/2B, 125/3,

107, 108, 115/2, 115/6, 115/11, 118/2, 122/2, 124, 109, 106/1B, 106/1C,

7/3, 7/4, 106/2A and 106/1A situated within the Registration Sub-

District, Taluka- Mulshi, District Pune, Village - Bhugaon, Pune and

situate within the limits of Town Planning for Concerned Authority. To

take process of sale forward, the Court Receiver shall appoint a valuer

from this panel to value the said property. Once the valuation is done,

the Court Receiver shall file a report before this Court for fixing the

reserve price. It is made clear that the reserve price shall not be

disclosed to any party. Once the reserve price is fixed, the Court

Receiver shall seek further directions for advertisement etc. to take the

sale of the said property to its logical conclusion.

Ganesh Lokhande                                                    page 12 of 13
                                                   26-IA(L)-24451-2021.doc




12. This Court shall consider the grant of further reliefs in the

above Interim Application on 9th November, 2022. Stand over to 9th

November, 2022.

13. This order will be digitally signed by the Personal Assistant

of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a

digitally signed copy of this order.



                                            ( B. P. COLABAWALLA, J. )




Ganesh Lokhande                                                    page 13 of 13
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter