Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nikhil Kisan Deshmukh vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr
2022 Latest Caselaw 4729 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4729 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 May, 2022

Bombay High Court
Nikhil Kisan Deshmukh vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 4 May, 2022
Bench: Prakash Deu Naik
                                                                 1 of 3                17.IA.975.2022.doc




                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                             INTERIM APPLICATION NO.975 OF 2022
                                                             IN
                                               CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.295 OF 2022

                               Nikhil Kisa Deshmukh                                   Applicant
                                     versus
                               The State of Maharashtra and another                   Respondents

                               Mr.Tushar Sonawane, Advocate for applicant.
                               Mr.Ajinkya Udane, Advocate for respondentno.2.
                               Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, APP, for State.

                                                          CORAM :    PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

                                                          DATE   :   4th May 2022
                               PC :


                               1.     This is an application for suspension of sentence.             The
                               applicant has been convicted for offence u/s.7 punishable u/s.8 of
                               Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (`POCSO
                               Act') and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for 3 years. He is further
                               convicted for offence u/s.506 of IPC and sentenced to suffer
                               imprisonment for 1 year.


                               2.     The case of prosecution is that victim and accused are the
                               residents of same area. The victim was around 16 years of age at the
                               time of incident. On the date of incident he accused followed her
                               and proposed her for love. He also touched her neck and her back.
                               Accused then threatened her of dire consequences. Complaint was
                               lodged.
         Digitally signed by
MANISH   MANISH SURESH
SURESH   THATTE
         Date: 2022.05.06
THATTE   10:38:47 +0530



                               3.     The maximum sentence imposed by the Trial Court is of 3
                                    2 of 3                   17.IA.975.2022.doc


years. The applicant was on bail during trial. There is no adverse
report of misuse of facility of bail. It appears that victim is married
in her life.


4.      Learned APP submitted that specific overt act has been
attributed to the applicant which is evident from the deposition of
victim girl. Learned advocate for respondent no.2 submitted that
overt act has been attributed to the applicant.       The victim was
touched on her neck and back which shows the intention of accused.
The victim was threatened that she would be killed if she disclose the
incident.


5.      The sentence of imprisonment had been suspended by the Trial
Court on the date of conviction for a stipulated period.                  The
suspension was continued by way of interim relief vide order dated
31st March 2022. The appeal may not reach for final hearing in near
future.     The sentence is of short term and sentence can be
suspended.
                                ORDER

(i) Interim Application is allowed and disposed of;

(ii) Interim order dated 31st March 2021 is confirmed;

(iii) During pendency of Criminal Appeal No.295 of 2022, the sentence of imprisonment imposed vide judgment and order dated 8th March 2022 passed by learned Special Judge, Madgaon, District Raigad in Special Case No.69 of 2020 is suspended and applicant is directed to be released on bail on executing PR bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount;

(iv) The applicant is permitted to furnish cash bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/- for a period of eight weeks in lieuof surety;

                                    3 of 3                  17.IA.975.2022.doc


(v)    The applicant shall not harass to the victim girl and her family
members;

(vi) The applicant shall not contact victim girl in any manner;

(vii) The applicant shall attend Trial Court once in six months on First Saturday of the month till disposal of the Criminal Appeal;

(viii) In the event there are two consecutive defaults in attending the Trial Court, the Trial Court shall submit report to this Court;

(ix) In the event of default committed by the applicant in attending the Trial Court, the prosecution will be at liberty to prefer application for cancellation of bail.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter