Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R. V. Baviskar vs Endress Hausaer (I) Pvt., Ltd., ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 2817 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2817 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2022

Bombay High Court
R. V. Baviskar vs Endress Hausaer (I) Pvt., Ltd., ... on 23 March, 2022
Bench: R.P. Mohite-Dere
NISHA     Digitally signed by NISHA
          SANDEEP CHITNIS
SANDEEP   Date: 2022.03.25 12:32:10
CHITNIS   +0530




                                                         901-revn.297.2017w.ia.853.2022&appr..287.2017.doc


                                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                     CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.287 OF 2017
                                                                 (FOR BAIL)
                                                                   WITH
                                                 CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO.853 OF 2022
                                                                     IN
                                                CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.297 OF 2017
                                                                   WITH
                                                CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.297 OF 2017

                                      Rajesh Vitthal Baviskar                             ...Applicant
                                          Versus
                                      Endress + Hausaer (I) Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.            ...Respondents

                                      Mr. Dilip B. Shinde, for the Applicant.

                                      Mr. Jayant Bodke i/b Ms. Neha Mehta, for the Respondent No.1.

                                      Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar, A.P.P for the Respondent No.2- State.


                                                                CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

                                                               DATE : 23rd MARCH 2022


                                      P.C. :


                                      1.           On several dates till 2017, the matters were adjourned from

                                      time to time to enable the parties to arrive at an amicable settlement,

                                      however, settlement has not taken place. Since, conviction warrant has

                                      now been issued by the trial Court, the learned counsel for the applicant has

    N. S. Chitnis                                                                                               1/5
                                    901-revn.297.2017w.ia.853.2022&appr..287.2017.doc


                circulated the aforesaid matters.



                2.          Learned Counsel for the applicant on the last date was asked to

                file an affidavit-cum-undertaking of the applicant setting out how the

                amount of compensation as awarded by the trial Court and confirmed by

                the Appellate Court would be deposited by the applicant. Pursuant thereto,

                the learned counsel for the applicant has tendered an affidavit-cum-

                undertaking of the applicant dated 23rd March 2022, duly notarized. In the

                said affidavit-cum-undertaking, the applicant has stated that the trial Court

                had awarded compensation of Rs.43,09,876/- vide Judgment and Order

                dated 29th January 2013 passed in Case No.826/SS/2009; and that the said

                Judgment and Order of conviction and sentence was confirmed by the

                Appellate Court. It is stated that the applicant had deposited a sum of

                Rs.8,61,976/- in the trial Court i.e. in the Court of the learned Metropolitan

                Magistrate, 72nd Court, Vikhroli, Mumbai on 26th September 2013 by

                demand draft dated 24th August 2013 and a receipt to that effect is annexed

                as Annexure - A to the affidavit-cum-undertaking. It is further stated by

                the applicant that due to Covid 19 pandemic, the business was closed and

                that he was facing severe financial crunch. The applicant has today brought


N. S. Chitnis                                                                              2/5
                                     901-revn.297.2017w.ia.853.2022&appr..287.2017.doc


                a demand draft dated 22nd March 2022 drawn on the ICICI Bank Limited,

                Ghatkopar-Pant Nagar Branch, Mumbai for Rs.4,31,000/-, in favour of the

                learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 72nd Court, Vikhroli, Mumbai, alongwith

                the said affidavit-cum-undertaking. The applicant has in para 5 of the said

                affidavit-cum-undertaking set out in detail how the balance amount of

                Rs.30,16,900/-will be deposited by the applicant in six installments by way

                of   demand draft i.e. Rs.5,02,816/- on or before 22 nd April 2022;

                Rs.5,02,816/- on or before 22nd May 2022; Rs.5,02,816/- on or before 22nd

                June 2022; Rs.5,02,816/- on or before 22nd July 2022; Rs.5,02,816/- on or

                before 22nd August 2022 and Rs.5,02,816/- on or before 22 nd September

                2022. The applicant has further undertaken in para 6 of the affidavit-cum-

                undertaking to deposit the above demand drafts in the Court of the learned

                Metropolitan Magistrate, 72nd Court, Vikhroli, Mumbai, on the dates as

                stated aforesiad.



                3.          Having regard to the affidavit-cum-undertaking filed by the

                applicant, the applicant's sentence is suspended and he is granted interim

                bail, till the next date, on the following terms and conditions:




N. S. Chitnis                                                                           3/5
                                     901-revn.297.2017w.ia.853.2022&appr..287.2017.doc


                                                   ORDER

(i) The Applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the

sum of 25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount;

(ii) The Applicant shall deposit Demand Draft of Rs.4,31,000/-, within

one week from today in the Court of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate,

72nd Court, Vikhroli, Mumbai, and the balance amounts as stated aforesaid;

(iii) It is made clear that, if there is failure to deposit the amounts as

stated aforesaid, the interim bail granted by this Court shall stand vacated

automatically, without further reference to the Court;

(iv) Only having regard to the affidavit-cum-undertaking of the applicant,

the conviction warrant issued as against the applicant, is stayed till the next

date.

4. Stand over to 1st April 2022, for recording compliance of the

first deposit of Rs.4,31,000/-. Thereafter, the matters to be listed one week

after the aforesaid dates i.e. dates of due payments to ensure there is

N. S. Chitnis 4/5 901-revn.297.2017w.ia.853.2022&appr..287.2017.doc

compliance of the affidavit-cum-undertaking.

5. In the meantime, the parties to explore the possibility of an

amicable settlement.

6. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

N. S. Chitnis                                                                               5/5
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter