Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2538 Bom
Judgement Date : 15 March, 2022
927judwp 1716.2017.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition (WP) No. 1716/2017
Sudhakar s/o Sheshrao Choudhary
Aged about 25 years, Occ. Student,
R/o. R/o. Wirkhed, Post. Watkhed(Bk),
Tah. Babhulgaon, District Yavatmal. ..... PETITIONER
// VERSUS //
1. The State of Maharashtra
through its Secretary,
Department of Tribal Development,
Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.
2. The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate
Scrutiny Committee through
its Chairman, Irwin Chowk,
Amravati Division, Amravati. .... RESPONDENT(S)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Ananta Ramteke, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Hemlata Jaipurkar, AGP for the respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR AND SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.J.
DATED : 15/03/2022
ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER:- A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)
The challenge raised in this writ petition is to the order
dated 09.01.2015 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate
Scrutiny Committee, Amravati invalidating the tribe claim of the
petitioner of belonging to "Mana" Scheduled Tribe. The claim of the
petitioner is based on various pre-costitutional documents with the entry
SMGate 927judwp 1716.2017.odt
"Mana". The Scrutiny Committee has proceeded to invalidate the claim
of the petitioner principally on the grounds that in the old entries the
words "Scheduled Tribe" are not mentioned and that the petitioner was
not able to establish affinity with Mana community.
2. Shri Ananta Ramteke, learned Counsel for the petitioner
submitted that the old records were produced by the petitioner which
were also verified by the Scrutiny Committee pertaining to the year 1934
and onwards. All these documents record the entry "Mana" and the same
had been verified by the Vigilance Cell. Merely because the words
"Scheduled Tribe" were not stated against these entries, same would not
be a reason to disallow the petitioner's claim. He further submitted that
the old documents prior to 1950 have great probative value and when
such documents are available the claim could not have been rejected
only by relying upon the affinity test. The learned Counsel placed
reliance on the decision in Gajanan s/o Pandurang Shende Vs. Head-
Master, Govt. Ashram School, Dongargaon Salod and others [2018(2)
Mh.L.J. 460] as well as the judgment dated 24.02.2020 in Writ Petition
No. 6711/2018 (Mr. Sandeep Shatrughan Dharne Vs. The Commissioner,
Tribal Research and Training Institute and ors. ). It was thus submitted
that the order of the Scrutiny Committee was liable to be set aside.
SMGate 927judwp 1716.2017.odt
3. On the other hand, Ms. Hemlata Jaipurkar, learned Assistant
Government Pleader for the respondents supported the impugned order.
It was submitted that in the absence of the petitioner indicating affinity
to "Mana" Scheduled Tribe the claim of the petitioner was not liable to
be upheld. It would not be permissible merely on the basis of old
documents to accept the status of the petitioner as claimed by him. It
was thus submitted that there was no reason to interfere with the order
passed by the Scrutiny Committee.
4. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and we
have perused the documents placed on record. A perusal of the report of
the Vigilance Cell dated 30.10.2010 indicates that in all the pre-
constitutional documents entry "Mana" has been shown. There is no
document bearing any contrary entry. The old documents relied are of
the years 1919, 1933, 1935 and 1945. All consistent entries therein
indicate that the forefathers of the petitioner belong to "Mana"
Scheduled Tribe. The Scheduled Tribe Order having came into force in
the year 1950 there was no occasion to mention the caste/tribe in the
documents prior to coming into force of the Constitution (Scheduled
Tribes) Order, 1950. It is thus found that these pre-consitutional
documents carry greater probative value.
SMGate 927judwp 1716.2017.odt
5. In so far as affinity test is concerned, we find that the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Anand vs. Committee for Scrutiny
and Verification of Tribe Claims [2011(6) Mh.L.J. 919] has held that
higher degree of probative value ought to be given to old documents and
in such cases the affinity test cannot be regarded as the litmus test for
establishing the link to the claimant with Scheduled Tribe only.
Aforesaid decisions have been considered by this Court in Gajanan s/o
Pandurang Shende and Mr. Sandeep Shatrughan Dharne (supra). Thus,
merely on the basis of the affinity test the claim of the petitioner was not
liable to be rejected. We therefore find that the Scrutiny Committee
committed an error in invalidating the tribe claim of the petitioner.
6. For the aforesaid reasons, we pass the following order:-
i. The order passed by the Scheduled Tribe Caste
Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati on 09.01.2015 is
set aside.
ii. It is declared that the petitioner belongs to "Mana"
Scheduled Tribe which is Entry No. 18 of the Constitution
(Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950.
iii. The Scrutiny Committee shall issue Validity
Certificate to the petitioner within a period of four weeks
SMGate 927judwp 1716.2017.odt
from the production of this order.
7. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no order
as to costs.
8. Civil Application (CAW) No. 481/2022 is disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
Digitally signed
by SANDIP
SANDIP MAHADEV
GATE
MAHADEV Date:
GATE 2022.03.17
17:38:57
+0530
SMGate
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!