Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mumtaz Ui Hakim S/O Gulam Rasul And ... vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Kamptee ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 2155 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2155 Bom
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2022

Bombay High Court
Mumtaz Ui Hakim S/O Gulam Rasul And ... vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Kamptee ... on 2 March, 2022
Bench: V.M. Deshpande, Amit B. Borkar
appw180.21                                                                                    1
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR


               CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPW) NO. 180/2021
                                 IN
                 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 664/2020
                                        Mumtaz & ors.
                                          ...VERSUS...
                                          State & anr.
 **********************************************************************************************
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,                       Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders or directions
and Registrar's orders
**********************************************************************************************
                             Shri M.A. Qureshi, Advocate for the Petitioner(s)
                             Shri T.A. Mirza, APP for the Respondent/State


                          CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE & AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.

MARCH 02, 2022

This is an Application for correcting the typographical error in the prayer clause of the Writ Petition and which consequently occurred due to the same in the judgment dated 18/08/2021.

Heard Shri Qureshi, learned Advocate for the Applicants.

He submitted that in prayer clause (b) of Writ Petition No. 664/2020, the number of criminal case is wrongly typed as R.C.C. No. 319/2018 instead of R.C.C. No. 309/2017.

ANSARI

Till disposal of the Writ Petition by this Court on 18/08/2021, the Advocate for the Applicants did not move any application for correcting the said typographical mistake. Resultantly, when this Court allowed the Writ Petition by the judgment dated 18/08/2021 obviously, the number was typed R.C.C. No. 319/2018.

It is the duty of the learned Advocates appearing for the parties to state the correct number. It is quite possible that there may be typing mistake, however, efforts should be taken to correct the same as early as possible and in any case prior to the delivery of the judgment because the Courts will always mention the dates, names of parties, number of criminal cases as it is mentioned in the prayer clause.

Today, learned Advocate for the Applicants tendered his unconditional apology for the same and volunteers that he will pay Rs. 5,000/- to the High Court Legal Aid Committee, Nagpur.

His statement is accepted.

The Application is allowed. The Advocate for the Applicants is permitted to correct R.C.C.

ANSARI

No. 319/2018 to R.C.C. No. 309/2017. The amendment to be carried out forthwith.

Further in the judgment dated 18/08/2021, the number of criminal case be typed as R.C.C. No. 309/2017 instead of R.C.C. No. 319/2018 and corrected copy of the judgment be upload.

The costs be paid within a period of one week from today and only after payment of costs, the corrected copy of the judgment be upload.

The Application is disposed of.

(JUDGE) (JUDGE)

Signed By:AKRAM PARVEZ MAQSOOD AHMAD ANSARI Private Secretary to Hon'ble Judge Signing Date:02.03.2022 17:24

ANSARI

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter