Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6687 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2022
Judgment 1 W.P.No.3198.2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 3198 OF 2020
Mrs. Pearl Herald Michael,
Aged about 49 years, Occ. - Service,
R/o Plot No. 62-63, "Yashwardhan
Milestone" Rajaram Nagar,
Near Raut Sabhagruh, Katol road,
Nagpur. .... PETITIONER
// VERSUS //
1) The State of Maharashtra,
through Principal Secretary,
Department of Education,
Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.
2) The Deputy Director of Education,
Nagpur.
3) The Education Officer (Secondary),
Nagpur.
4) The Sikh Education Society,
Bezonbagh, Nagpur-440004,
through it's CEO
and General Secretary. .... RESPONDENTS
______________________________________________________________
Mr. Firdos Mirza, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. M.J. Khan, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Mr. N.H. Samudre, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
______________________________________________________________
CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
G.A. SANAP, JJ.
DATED : 14.07.2022
ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per Sunil B. Shukre, J.) Judgment 2 W.P.No.3198.2020.odt
1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally
by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. As per the Sub-rule (1)(b) of Rule 3 of the Maharashtra
Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules,
1981 (for short the "MEPS Rules"), the qualifications for being
appointed as a Headmaster or Headmistress of the secondary school
which must be possessed are as under :
(1) A bachelor's degree in teaching or education
of a statutory University or any other qualification
recognized by Government as equivalent thereto.
(2) Possessing not less than five years' total full-
time teaching experience after graduation in a
secondary school or junior college of Education.
(3) Two years experience after acquiring
bachelor's degree in teaching or education.
Sub-rule (1)(b) of Rule 3 of the MEPS Rules says so and so
also the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Alka Rameshrao
Patil Vs. Nutan Mahila Sarvodaya Balvikas Sanstha, Pachora & Others,
2009(3) ALL MR 858.
Judgment 3 W.P.No.3198.2020.odt
3. The Petitioner was appointed as an Assistant teacher on
27.06.1994 and although she was graduate at that time, the post of
graduate teacher was not available and therefore, it is seen from the
record, the appointment letter issued to her shows that the Petitioner
had qualification as H.S.S.C., D.Ed. But, the fact remains that the
Petitioner had obtained bachelor's degree in Arts in the year 1991.
4. The Petitioner was appointed as a graduate teacher on
01.08.2008 and this appointment has been duly approved by the
Education Officer. The report of the Education Officer dated
13.08.2021 acknowledges the fact that the Petitioner had got
qualification of B.Ed. in the year 2009. So, these facts make it clear
that the Petitioner was a graduate teacher at least since 01.08.2008
and worked so till her appointment as Headmistress on a primary
school run by the same education Society with effect from 01.10.2014.
It is also not in dispute that till her appointment as Headmistress on
01.10.2014, the Petitioner had continuously worked in a high school
since the year 1994, which year has been mentioned to be that of 1993
in the report of the Education Officer dated 13.08.2021. This only
shows that the Petitioner possessed all the qualifications as mentioned
in sub-rule(1)(b) of rule 3 of the MEPS Rules and the requisite
experience. It therefore follows that approval could not have been
refused to the appointment of the Petitioner on the ground that she did Judgment 4 W.P.No.3198.2020.odt
not possess requisite experience in terms of rules 3 (1) (b) of the MEPS
Rules.
5. The impugned orders also take an exception to transferring
the Petitioner from primary school to high school on the post of
Headmistress without obtaining prior no objection from the Education
Officer. Even this objection is devoid of any substance. Firstly, it is a
fact established on record by the Petitioner that the Petitioner was not
appointed as Headmistress on transfer but was appointed to be so in a
fresh selection process as per the rules. Therefore, change of position of
the Petitioner from Headmistress of a primary school to Headmistress
of a high school cannot be considered to be on account of her transfer
from primary school to high school and it would have to be considered
as fresh appointment made after following due procedure. Secondly,
there is no requirement in the MEPS Act or MEPS Rules or any law that
for transferring a teacher from primary school to the same post in the
higher secondary school, both run by the same Management, prior no
objection should be obtained from the Education Officer. Therefore,
even the second ground of objection taken the impugned order goes.
6. In the result, we are of view that the Petitioner has
established her case to be falling squarely within the provisions of law,
in particular, the provisions made in rule 3(1)(b) of the MEPS Rules Judgment 5 W.P.No.3198.2020.odt
and as such is entitled to have the approval of the Education Officer to
her appointment as Headmistress of the higher secondary school.
7. Therefore, the impugned orders dated 21.01.2020 and
13.02.2020 are hereby quashed and set aside. The Petition is allowed
in terms of prayer clause (b), which reads thus :-
"(b) to command the respondent no.3 to grant approval to the Appointment of the petitioner as Principal/Headmistress of Guru Nanak High School and Junior College managed by the respondent no.4 since 20.08.2019 i.e. her Date of Appointment alongwith all the benefits attached with the said Post."
No costs.
(G.A. SANAP, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.)
Kirtak
Digitally Signed By:KIRTAK
BHIMRAO JANARDHAN
Signing Date:14.07.2022
17:40
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!