Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Madhukar Deoram Zope And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 6248 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6248 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 July, 2022

Bombay High Court
Madhukar Deoram Zope And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 4 July, 2022
Bench: V. V. Kankanwadi
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                   8 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.317 OF 2021


                     MADHUKAR DEORAM ZOPE AND OTHERS
                                           VERSUS
                  THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
                                              ...
                        Mr. D.D. Pande, Advocate for petitioners
                  Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, APP for the respondent No.1
               Mr. Naseer Shaikh, Advocate for the respondent No.2
                                              ...

                                       CORAM :      SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.
                                       DATE :       04th JULY, 2022


PER COURT :



1              Learned Advocate Mr. D.D. Pande submits that his senior Mr.

Girish Nagori is going to argue the matter, however, Mr. Girish Nagori has

personal difficulty. In fact, what personal difficulty Mr. Girish Nagori has, he

is not explaining. One more fact to be noted is that by order dated

29.11.2021 this Court had directed the petitioners to file copies of

depositions on record. Thereafter, on the request of the petitioners the

matter came to be adjourned to 10.01.2022 on 10.12.2021. Thereafter it

appears that till 20.04.2022 the matter was not on board and when the

2 Cri.WP_317_2021

matter came up on board on 20.04.2022, the compliance of the said order

was not made and the matter came to be adjourned on 04.05.2022. On

04.05.2022 the similar situation continued and the matter was adjourned to

04.07.2022 i.e. today. Today also the copies of depositions have not been

filed. That means, since after 29.11.2021 the petitioners have not taken care

to file the copies of depositions on record and not taken care to comply with

the order dated 29.11.2021. When asked, the learned Advocate for the

petitioner is unable to give any reasonable ground for not complying with the

said order. No doubt, he has also tried to submit that he had filed the lose

copies of the depositions, but then, it is to be noted that the date on which he

has tendered to the office and why he had not paginated it. The other side

had not received the copies of those depositions.

2 It is to be noted that by order dated 24.03.2021 it was clarified

that there is no stay to the proceedings before the Trial Court. By this

petition the petitioners are challenging the Judgment and order dated

12.03.2020 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bhusawal, Dist. Jalgaon in

Criminal Revision No.75/2019 as well as order dated 25.07.2019 passed by

learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Yawal in Regular Criminal Case

No.115/2015, wherein after recording evidence before framing charge the

matter was posted for framing of charge. The learned Advocate for

3 Cri.WP_317_2021

respondent No.2 informs that the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class,

Yawal has not proceeded with the matter though it was clarified by this Court

that there is no stay to the proceedings before him. That means, the charge

is not yet framed. In fact, by order dated 29.09.2021 the petitioners were

directed to produce the copies of depositions recorded before framing of

charge. It means, it is not the order dated 29.11.2021 to be complied but it

was in fact, order dated 29.09.2021 that was to be complied with. This

shows clear negligence on the part of the petitioners to proceed with the

matter. In fact, when no reasonable ground has been shown the writ petition

deserves to be dismissed, however, the client should not suffer and, therefore,

the matter is adjourned, subject to deposit of costs of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two

Thousand only) by the learned Advocate for the petitioners from his pocket

to the High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad on or before

08.07.2022. The copies of the depositions be positively filed before this

Court on or before 13.07.2022, by giving the copy of the same to the other

side in advance.

3 Place the matter for further consideration on 15.07.2022.

4 It has been informed that the matter before the learned Trial

Judge i.e. Regular Criminal Case No.115/2015 has been kept on 13.07.2022.

4 Cri.WP_317_2021

Learned Magistrate is directed to take up the matter positively for the stage

for which the matter is and it is again clarified that there is no stay to the

proceedings before him.

( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J. )

agd

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter