Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gautam Ganpat Sable vs Municipal Corporation Of Greater ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 127 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 127 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2022

Bombay High Court
Gautam Ganpat Sable vs Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... on 4 January, 2022
Bench: Nitin W. Sambre
                       (2)-WP-2493-21.doc.


                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

          Digitally
                                        WRIT PETITION NO.2493 OF 2021
          signed by
          BALAJI
BALAJI    GOVINDRAO
GOVINDRAO PANCHAL
PANCHAL   Date:
          2022.01.04
          17:52:19
                       Gautam Ganpat Sable                                 ..Petitioner
                            Versus
          +0530




                       Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
                       and Ors.                                           ..Respondents

                       Mr. Ramchandra K. Mendadkar, for the Petitioner.
                       Mr. Om Suryavanshi, for the Respondent No.1 - MCGM.
                       Mr. Irfan Shaikh i/by Sachindra B. Shetye, for Respondent No.2 -
                       State Election Commission.
                       None for Respondent No.3.

                                                     CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 4th JANUARY, 2022

P.C.

1. Heard.

2. Leave to amend.

3. Amendment be carried out within one week.

4. With the assistance of counsel for the petitioner, I have perused the evidence of PW-2 - Dnyaneshwar Suresh Kutwad, who is working as Deputy Collector (Enroachment), 'N' Ward. His testimony is analyzed in the judgment impugned and finding is recorded that the property over which the encroachment is shown is

BGP. 1 of 2 (2)-WP-2493-21.doc.

recorded in the name of late father of the returned candidate - respondent No.3.

5. Since the returned candidate has not contested the said notice of removal of encroachment, case for consideration is made out.

6. Hence, Admit.

7. Mr. Om Suryavanshi, learned counsel waives notice on behalf of respondent No.1 - MCGM.

8. Mr. Irfan Shaikh, learned counsel waives notice on behalf of respondent No.2 - State Election Commission.



                                        [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]




BGP.                                                      2 of 2
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter