Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13129 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 December, 2022
1 wp8126.22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.8126/2022
1. Thannu S/o Purkha Dhikar,
Aged about 67 years,
Occupation :- Agriculturist
2. Surendra S/o Babulal Dhikare,
Aged about 59 years,
Occupation :- Agriculturist
3. Mansa W/o Jayta Uikeerme,
Aged about 52 years,
Occupation :- Agriculturist
4. Lalman S/o Nathu Mawaskar,
Aged about 49 years,
Occupation :- Agriculturist
5. Smt. Ganga S/o Kalu Dhikar,
Aged about 64 years,
Occu. :- Agriculturist
All R/o. At Semadoh (Dhana),
Taluka- Chikhaldara, District -
Amravati.
.....PETITIONERS
...V E R S U S...
1. State of Maharashtra,
Through its Secretary,
Tribal Development Department,
Mantralaya Mumbai-400 032
2. State of Maharashtra,
Through its Secretary of Forest,
Mantralaya, Mumbai- 40 032
3. Divisional Level Forest Rights
Committee and Division
Commissioner through President,
Amravati
2 wp8126.22.odt
4. District Level Forest Rights
Committee and Collector,
Amravati, through its President
5. Range Forest Officer, Taluka
Tahsil - Shemadoh Post -
Chikhadra, District - Amravati
6. Chikhaldara Tahsildar,
District - Amravati
7. Gram Panchayat, Semadoh
District - Amravati, Through its
Secretary, Tahsil - Shemadoh
Post - Chikadra, District - Amravati
...RESPONDENTS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. S. I. Ghatte, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. A. S. Fulzele, Additional Government Pleader for respondent
nos. 1 to 6.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM:- A. S. CHANDURKAR & ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.
DATED :- 16.12.2022
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: A. S. Chandurkar, J.)
Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard
Mr.Ghatte, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr. Fulzele, learned
Additional Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 to 6. Service
to respondent no.7 is dispensed with.
2. The grievance of the petitioners is that pursuant to the
orders dated 09.07.2021 and 11.02.2021, passed by the Divisional
Level Forest Rights Committee remanding the petitioners' 3 wp8126.22.odt
applications to the District Level Forest Rights Committee, those
proceedings have not been adjudicated. Without doing so, the
petitioners are sought to be dispossessed.
3. We find that in the light of the provisions of Section
4(5) of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest
Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, till the
proceedings of remand are decided, the possession of the
petitioners is not liable to be disturbed. Accordingly, the writ
petition is disposed of by directing the District Level Forest Rights
Committee to decide the proceedings that have been remanded in
accordance with law and preferably within a period of two months
expiring on 28.02.2023.
4. Till such time the proceedings are pending with the
District Level Forest Rights Committee, the possession of the
petitioners shall remain protected.
Rule is made absolute in the above terms. No order as
to costs.
(Anil L. Pansare, J.) (A. S. Chandurkar, J.)
kahale Digitally signed byYOGESH
ARVIND KAHALE
Signing Date:19.12.2022
10:38
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!