Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8009 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2022
15-SJ-3-21+.DOC
Sayali Upasani
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.3 OF 2021
IN
COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO.132 OF 2020
The Board of Trustees of the Port of ... Plaintiff
Mumbai
Versus
Kausturi Commodities Pvt. Ltd & Ors ...Defendants
Mr. Rahul Jain a/w Ms. Khushboo Rapani i/b HSA Advocates,
for Plaintiff
None for Defendants
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J.
DATED : 18th August, 2022 PC:-
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the plaintiff.
2. The writ of summons addressed to the defendant No.3 is
returned un-served.
3. Plaintiff to take steps to serve defendant No.3 by way of
substituted service.
4. The defendant Nos. 1 and 2 seem to have filed an affidavit
seeking leave to defend the suit on 22nd January, 2021.
15-SJ-3-21+.DOC
5. The learned Counsel for the plaintiff submits that the
plaintiff has not been served with the copy of the affidavit
seeking leave to defend the suit filed on behalf of the defendant
Nos. 1 and 2.
Let the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 serve the copy of the
affidavit on the plaintiff within a period of two weeks.
6. The plaintiff is at liberty to file an affidavit-in-rejoinder
within two weeks thereafter.
7. List after four weeks.
8. In the meanwhile, the plaintiff is at liberty to file an
application for substituted service against defendant No.3.
9. List on 15th September, 2022.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!