Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Future General India Insurance ... vs Kum. Amit Anil Khatavkar Thr.His ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 4478 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4478 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 April, 2022

Bombay High Court
Future General India Insurance ... vs Kum. Amit Anil Khatavkar Thr.His ... on 27 April, 2022
Bench: Bharati Dangre
                                  1/3                         31 FA-67-22.doc


         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                        FIRST APPEAL NO.67 OF 2022
                                    WITH
                 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1993 OF 2022
                                    WITH
                 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.486 OF 2022


Future General India Insurance Co.               ..     Appellant
Ltd.   through    it's  authorised
representative

                        Versus

Amit   Anil Khatavkar      (minor)               ..     Respondents
through his next friend Madhuri A.
Khatavkar & Anr.
                           ...
Mr.Rajesh Kanojia with Ms.Nikita Singh and Ms.Sandhya
Singh i/b Res Juris for the Appellant.
Mr.Sangramsinh Yadav for the Respondents and for the
Applicant in IA/1993/22.
                         ...

                          CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 27th APRIL, 2022

P.C:-

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1993 OF 2022

1. By the present application, the applicant seeks withdrawal of 50% of the amount i.e. Rs.40,21,484/-, which has been deposited by the Insurance Company, subject to which there has been a stay to the effect and operation to the impugned judgment.


M.M.Salgaonkar





                                  2/3                  31 FA-67-22.doc


2. The applicant is a 21 years' old boy, who met with an accident on 11/10/2015, while he was accompanying his friends in a Fiat Linea Car and on account of the high speed driving, the driver lost control over the car and dashed against the railing of the bridge, over the Venna River. The impact was so grave that the railing broke and the car fell in the river. The applicant sustained serious injuries in form of head injury, fracture on chest and multiple injuries all over the body. He was required to be administered treatment for considerable long period of time and claimed to have incurred huge expenses. A claim of Rs.50,00,000/- came to be instituted, which was considered vide the impugned Judgment and it was awarded to the extent of Rs.61,81,542/-. The entire amount of compensation is deposited in the Court and the applicant seeks withdrawal of 50% of the amount.

3. On perusal of the application it can be seen that, here is a young boy, whose family was required to bear huge medical expenses, coupled with ancillary expenses like travelling, physiotherapy charges, massage charges, nourishing food and, accordingly, an amount of Rs.29,89,542/- came to be granted, under the said heads by the impugned Judgment.

4. As the family was required to incur a whopping sum on the treatment, one can imagine the plight of the family with a boy, who has sustained 100% disability.

In the wake of the aforesaid, it would be appropriate to permit the applicant to withdraw 50% of the amount of

M.M.Salgaonkar

3/3 31 FA-67-22.doc

compensation, as the amount is needed for his treatment and his condition as on today, do not permit him to walk independently and he is unable to put his right hand to use and his mental capability has also slowed down, during this period.

5. Since the whole purpose to award compensation on account of an accident arising out of the motor vehicle is to ensure that the misery, pain and agony of the victim or his family is minimised, though it may not offer a substitution for it, but surely will offer some solace. In the wake of the huge expenses incurred and the present condition of the applicant coupled with the fnancial distress, which the family fnd itself into, I deem it expedient to allow the application. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

The Tribunal shall permit the withdrawal of the amount, subject to an undertaking fled by the applicant to the effect that in case the Insurance Company succeeds in the Appeal, he shall bring back the amount alongwith the interest that will be determined at the time of adjudication of the Appeal.

( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)

M.M.Salgaonkar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter