Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sanjana Sachin Pawar vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Social ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 4413 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4413 Bom
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2022

Bombay High Court
Sanjana Sachin Pawar vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Social ... on 26 April, 2022
Bench: R.P. Mohite-Dere, Madhav J. Jamdar
                                                                                    4. WP 4843-2022.doc
          Digitally signed
          by RUPALI
          RAJESH
RUPALI    WAKODIKAR
RAJESH
WAKODIKAR Date:
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          2022.04.26
          19:05:20
          +0530



                                             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                             WRIT PETITION NO. 4843 OF 2022


                         Sanjana Sachin Pawar                                ...Petitioner
                              Versus
                         The State of Maharashtra Thr.
                         Social Justice and Special Assistance
                         Dept. and Ors.                                      ...Respondents

                         Ms. Meenaz Kakalia a/w Veda Thakker for the Petitioner.

                         Mrs. Neha Bhide, 'B' Panel Counsel for the Respondent-State.

                         Mr. Om Suryawanshi for the Respondent No.2 - MCGM.


                                                      CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
                                                              MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ.

DATE : 26th APRIL, 2022

P.C. :

1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the

respondent No.1 - State of Maharashtra through the Social Justice and

Special Assistance Department, to grant compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to

the petitioner in accordance with the the Judgment of the Apex Court dated

27th March, 2014 in Safai Karamchari Andolan & Ors. V/s Union of India

& Ors. In the said Judgment, the Apex Court in para 14, after noting

various provisions of the Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act,

Wakodikar 1/3

4. WP 4843-2022.doc

2013 and having regard to several orders passed by the said Court, issued

certain directions. One of the direction set out in clause (iii) reads thus;

"(iii) Identify the families of all persons who have died in sewerage work (manholes, septic tanks) since 1993 and award compensation of Rs.10 lakhs for each such death to the family members depending on them."

2. The Apex Court, directed the State Government and Union

Territories to fully implement the said directions and to take appropriate

action for non-implementation as well as for violation of the provisions of

the 2013 Act.

3. Learned Counsel for the State submits that although the

incident in question had taken place on 11 th May, 2017, the petition was

filed only in 2021. She submits that the petitioner ought to have made an

application/representation to the Sub Divisional Officer, Mumbai Eastern

Suburb. She further submits that no details have been given by the

petitioner, with respect to petitioner's husband's employer.

4. It is the duty of the State to identify the families of the persons

who have died in sewerage work (manholes, Septic tanks) since 1990 and

award compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- for each, such death to the family

members depending on them. It is thus, the duty of the State

Wakodikar 2/3

4. WP 4843-2022.doc

Government to carry out the said exercise.

5. Learned Counsel for the State seeks time.

6. We direct a competent and responsible officer from the

department of Social Justice and Special Assistance Department, as well as

from the Revenue Department, be remain present with instructions

tomorrow i.e. on 27th April, 2022 at 3.30 p.m.

7. We also direct a responsible officer from the Sakinaka Police

Station to remain present with the papers of investigation in connection

with C.R.No.74 of 2017 registered with the Sakinaka Police Station,

concerning the death of Sachin Pawar.

8. We also direct a responsible officer from the Respondent No.2-

MCGM to remain present with the file pertaining to the petitioner's

husband.

9. Stand over to 27th April, 2022 at 3.30 p.m.

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Wakodikar                                                                             3/3
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter