Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4063 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 April, 2022
rpa 1/3 28 ia 888 2022 common.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.888 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.259 OF 2016
Ashvin Subhash Gupta .. Applicant/Appellant
Versus
M/s.Suman Motels Ltd. and Ors. .. Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.884 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.260 OF 2016
Mrs.Damayanti Mukesh Marolia .. Applicant/Appellant
Versus
M/s.Suman Motels Ltd. and Ors. .. Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.886 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.261 OF 2016
Mrs.Heena Mahesh Marolia .. Applicant/Appellant
Versus
M/s.Suman Motels Ltd. and Ors. .. Respondents
......
Mr.Rajendra Sorankar, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant.
Mr.S.K. Chaurasia i/b. M/s.Raj & Associates, Advocate for Respondent
Nos.1 to 7.
Mr.S.V. Gavand, APP for the Respondent No.8-State.
......
Digitally
signed by
RAJESHRI
RAJESHRI PRAKASH
PRAKASH AHER
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
AHER Date:
2022.04.20
14:14:30
+0530 DATED : APRIL 18, 2022.
rpa 2/3 28 ia 888 2022 common.doc
P.C. :
All these interim applications are preferred by the
appellant/original complainant in Appeal challenging the judgment
and order of acquittal of respondents for offence under Section 138 of
the Negotiable Instruments Act ("NI Act", for short). The applicant
/appellant is the original complainant in the complaints fled against
the respondents who are acquitted by the Court of learned
Metropolitan Magistrate 20th Court at Mazgaon, Mumbai.
2 Learned advocate for the appellant/applicant submitted
that the subject transaction is of 1997. The cheques were dishonoured
in the year 2000, and, the complaint was fled in the same year. The
respondents were acquitted vide judgment and order dated 18 th April,
2013. The Appeals had come up for hearing before this Court and vide
order dated 31st July, 2019, the Appeals were posted on 8 th August,
2019, for fnal disposal. However, the matters did not reach for fnal
hearing.
3 The respondents have fled reply opposing the prayers
sought in these applications. Learned counsel for respondents submits
that in the application the age of constituted attorney, who is senior
citizen has been mentioned and not the age of original complainant.
No ground is made out for listing the Appeals for hearing.
rpa 3/3 28 ia 888 2022 common.doc 4 It is noted that the complaint was fled in the year 2000.
The complaint relates to the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act.
The respondents were acquitted by the trial Court. Order dated 31 st
July, 2019, indicate that the Appeals posted for hearing fnally. In this
circumstances, the Appeals be posted for hearing on 15 th June, 2022
at the bottom of the admission Board.
5 All the Interim Applications stand disposed of
accordingly.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!