Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Narayan S/O Ambadas Kothale vs Himmatlal S/O Manikchand Dhurv ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 13574 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13574 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2021

Bombay High Court
Narayan S/O Ambadas Kothale vs Himmatlal S/O Manikchand Dhurv ... on 21 September, 2021
Bench: A.S. Chandurkar, Pushpa V. Ganediwala
 19.LPA194.12.odt                                     1

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                        NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

                    LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.194/2012 IN
                        WRIT PETITION NO.779/2011(D)
      Narayan s/o Ambadas Kothale (since dead through LRs)- Smt. Vanida wd/o
                         Narayanrao Kothale and others
                                       Vs.
                       Himmatlal s/o Manikchand Dhruv.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of                             Court's or Judge's Order
 Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
 or directions and Registrar's order

        None for the parties.


          CORAM :-         A.S.CHANDURKAR AND PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, JJ.

DATED :- September 21, 2021.

This Letters Patent Appeal was listed on 9 th September, 2021. As the learned counsel for the appellant was not present, the appeal was adjourned to 15 th September, 2021. On that day also since there was no appearance on behalf of the appellant, the appeal was kept today.

It is seen from the record that the appellant is the original plaintiff who had filed suit for eviction of the respondent under the provisions of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (for short, 'the said Act'). The trial Court decreed the suit. An appeal was filed by the tenant under Section 34 of the said Act challenging that decree. The District Court allowed that appeal and the said judgment was challenged by the original plaintiff in Writ Petition No. 779/2011. By the impugned judgment the said writ petition has been dismissed.

It is found that in view of the decisions in Ramdayal G. Khandelwal Vs. Mahendra B. Khandelwal and ors. 2021(4) Mh.L.J.653 as well as in Letters Patent Appeal No.495/2011 in Writ Petition No.4699/2011 (Ansilee S/o Vakayil Verghese Vs.Ravi

Prakash S/o Mohanrao Jangade) decided on 16.09.2021, a Letters Patent Appeal challenging the judgment passed in a writ petition that arises out of the orders passed by the Small Causes Court and thereafter the District Court under the provisions of said Act, is not maintainable.

In view of aforesaid position, it is held that Letters Patent Appeal No.194/2012 is not maintainable and it is disposed of as such. It is open for the appellants to raise a challenge to the judgment of the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.779/2011 in accordance with law. Points raised in the Letters Patent Appeal are kept open. The parties shall bear their own costs.

                        JUDGE                                 JUDGE




 Andurkar..





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter