Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Ambey Mining Pvt. Ltd. ... vs Western Coalfields Limited, ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 12689 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12689 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2021

Bombay High Court
M/S. Ambey Mining Pvt. Ltd. ... vs Western Coalfields Limited, ... on 6 September, 2021
Bench: S.B. Shukre, Anil S. Kilor
                                               1/2                        05-CAW 1131.2021

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

            CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 1131 OF 2021
                                 IN
          WRIT PETITION NO. 1648 OF 2021 (DECIDED)
(M/s.Ambey Mining Private Limited vs. Western Coalfields Limited & ors.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders                                     Court's or Judge's Orders.
or directions and Registrar's orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       Mr. Hitesh Verma, Advocate for applicant/petitioner.
                       Mr. G. E. Mohrir, Advocate for respondents.


                                         CORAM       :     SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
                                                           ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

DATE : 06/09/2021

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, especially when we find that there is a clerical error, which is mentioning about the bar on an employee of one of the parties to act as an arbitrator. Therefore, the line Nos.2 to 5 of para 12 of the Judgment and Order dated 02/08/2021 containing the following sentence,

".... It is contended that a person being an employee of one of the parties which is the State or its

KOLHE

2/2 05-CAW 1131.2021

instrumentalities cannot per se be a bar to him acting as an arbitrator. ....."

be substituted by the following sentence,

" ..... It is contended that bar to act as an arbitrator placed upon an employee of any of the parties, which is the State or its instrumentalities, cannot per se be a bar operating on the arbitration proceedings. ....."

3. The corrections be made forthwith.

4. The application is disposed of accordingly.

                                       JUDGE                                     JUDGE




KOLHE




 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter