Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Divisional Railway Manager ... vs Shri. Satish S. Khangare Through ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 15692 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15692 Bom
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2021

Bombay High Court
Divisional Railway Manager ... vs Shri. Satish S. Khangare Through ... on 29 October, 2021
Bench: A.S. Chandurkar
                                             1                                 MCA381-21.odt


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.381/2021 IN W.P. NO.7549/2019 (D)
   (DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, NAGPUR & ANOTHER VERSUS
                            SATISH S. KHANGAARE)

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions                   Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.
        Shri R.S. Sundaram, counsel for the applicants.
        Shri Rahul Dhande, counsel for the non-applicant.

       CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.

DATED : 29TH OCTOBER, 2021.

The applicants seek review of the judgment dated 18.12.2019 that was passed in Writ Petition No.7549 of 2019 with other connected writ petitions.

The principal ground on which the review of the aforesaid judgment is sought is that an earlier order passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal dated 22.05.2019 by which the Tribunal noted the conduct of the representative of the workman could not be referred when the writ petition was decided. In addition by seeking to amend the review application another ground sought to be urged is that the Department of Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Nagpur did not have any person of legal standing to effectively defend the Department in the proceedings before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal.

I have perused the review application, the averments in C.A.O. No.613 of 2021 as well as the documents sought to be placed on record vide C.A.O. No.635 of 2021. I have also gone through the reply as well as additional reply filed on behalf of the non-applicant. I find that the review application as filed alongwith the additional grounds do not indicate any error apparent on the face of record warranting exercise of review jurisdiction. The review application is accordingly dismissed. The pending civil applications are also disposed of.

(A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.) Signed By: Digitally signed byROHIT DATTATRAYA APTE Signing Date:29.10.2021 17:01 APTE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter